The invention of an en vogue device to keep our (emphasis *our*) government in check

The folowing was inspired by several conversations with friends. One of which involved a friend cocking his head and looking at me like I just suggested the world was flat, when I said the government are employed by us.

We've long seen the misuse of words and conflation to things they have nothing to do with except to bridge a wide gap between a media narrative and a group they dislike (I say white...you say nationalist...well you're supposed to anyway). It's a slippery slope that's already dipped to depths that it shouldn't have. But perhaps the most powerful, and therefore dangerous, use is equating a government to the country that it runs. As much as this can be hilarious and can generate a lot of memes and laughs, the more practice the mainstream now have at making these conflations (anyone they dislike is far right), the more it will come across to new eyes and ears as believable.

This most dangerous conflation of a country with its' government currently manifests itself whenever Theresa May refers to decision she makes as that of "our country" and "us" when frankly, what she preaches is anything but what the UK wants and brings anything but unity.

Cue my invention. It's not a proposal of overturning the way our government is elected or represented. Rather its a more basic way of getting back our words. It may at first sound drastic, but if we don't start here then apart from an entirely new dictionary to fit a liberal agenda, what we'll need if we slip any further down this slope won't just be drastic it will be apocalyptic. The purpose of this new invention isn't just to get our words back, it's to get our government back.

A public satisfaction jumpsuit. From a fashion viewpoint, with the globalists' love of jumpsuits this could well catch on quickly. But that's just the form. On to the substance: fitted within said jumpsuit would be a collar of consequences and feedback ankle tags. Once a week, the public will have access to a website that allows them to grade their satisfaction with the level of effort they feel the prime minister has put in that week. Should it be, as I would assume lately, severly disappointed, then the zap Mrs May would receive around her ankles and collar would elicit a rather entertaining albeit involuntary break dance.

Now before you accuse me of being an extremist, the jumpsuit functions are two fold. Should she, even if not get the desired results, be perceived as putting in hard work to achieve, then these very same collar and ankle receptors will offer a rather lovely massage. If she merely coasts by, ie. Just "does the job" then the public would grade her around the middle, or average, rating and the jumpsuit would not be put to action. Rather easily acheived given the poor precedent Mr Cameron (and the 2 before him) set. And though no pain (or pleasure) would be felt, one would assume come next election, Mrs May would be out of a job. And it would be welcomed by a few after the legacy she leaves hardly makes the job the poison chalice Alex Ferguson left at Manchester United.

Far from extreme, this new attire would prevent us descending to a civil war. And will give power back to the people, encourage accountability and bring more unity than the prime minister currently seems obliged to offer