Why don't we treat creeping sharia (with the thousands of lives it's ruined) the same as we treat the threat of Corona?

....with its thousands now recovered. Minus the physical trauma and lifetime of mental trauma following this ailment. As far as we know. So far along with WHO, the investigative bodies haven't listed these as symptoms. 

Not that it is generally wise comparing religions to epidemics, the differences normally being vast- no physiological infection, there's at least some element of choice, inherited values. A lot different ways people 'find' religion. Perhaps as many as the amount of differences between the different types of religion. Most of which have accumulated over time, due to secularism and modernisation, a freedom of choice. Something highlighted as lacking in the religion of war (it's scholarly name until September 12th 2001) as well as in epidemics. Rightly, one of the actions several countries' governments have seen fit to call a national state of emergency for the spread of corona. Why then, has the same action not been taken against something that has also proven a deadly epidemic? Side effects due to it's immovable, non developing mantra.

At its heart, purely a set of ideas that has been allowed to develop much further. Compare this to Christianity, Alfred the great (the best part of 1500 years ago) liberating many with translations of texts preventing the pillars of the religion increasing even further the size of the pedestals on which they stood. Thus preventing any nefarious teachings becoming widespread further down the line. Along the way and even now many other figures test the religions' compatibility. When children were found abused by figures in the religion, the whole movement was horrified from outside and within. Perhaps because there are no actual teachings encouring child abuse in this religion. Secularism and modernisation also separate the gap between islam and other religions. Compromise has been met by religions entering the western world at later dates. Legislation has also superseded them without cause for disruption to practice and teachings. Most Hindus, Jews, Buddhists adhere to the American constitution for example. But like a virus, developing different ways to penetrate its host, islam has developed. From brute force to now navigating via outbreeding and even using legislation via taking over councils. Hypocrisy witnessed throughout the 90's in individuals lambasting the counties whose benefits systems they bled dry. Akin to a virus not merely settling to exist in it's host but cause all kinds of disruption. The legislation has wavered for systemic enemies also in recent times, see Roger Stone. So expecting it to even stand firm and be consistent, let alone be retroactive, is a long shot. Perhaps if it had acted consistently, maybe the timing worked well and weak leaders allowed islams penetration. Maybe harnessed logic and reason could end the, "yellow peril", kung flu, Hong Kong fluey...call it what you will. Humanity even, that so many survivors of islam have found. Such remedies don't really have bacterial counterparts. But looking at the way we've waited and waited while one virus has spread and spread, I'm not holding my breath. Unless I'm walking past someone with a cough. 

Are our immune systems braver than us? I ask this because there have been philosophers and politicians aware of legitimate answers for creeping sharia yet they haven't implemented them. Even solutions implemented around the world. Russia has neither epidemic for example. It's hard to tell though given our immune systems aren't working against a media and even now system of law working against it. To have legitimate fear has now become a phobia apparently. 

Am I saying "all muslims"?? Of course like viruses I don't equate all of them to be deadly...but how do we tell which ones are? I know, how about we put things on hold until we do. What a novel idea.

#CreepingSharia #Corona #LogicIsNotPhobia