Evidence Of Crimes By Hillary’s Clinton Foundation? Hearing December 13, 2018.

According to whistleblowers, there are multiple evidence of alleged crimes by Hillary’s Clinton Foundation. Including, but not limited to, corruption, and acting as an agent of foreign Governments. Evidence where presented during the December 13th, 2018 investigative public hearing into Hillary’s Clinton Foundation. Find nine videos & transcripts below about those evidence.

If those evidence of alleged crimes are true, will the same Laws apply to all? Or are some people above the Laws? If Hillary's Clinton Foundation was illegally organized or operated for the benefit of Bill, Chelsea, Hillary Clinton, and engaged in illegal political activity, will the Foundation's tax exempt status be revoke?

1. Clinton Foundation Acting As Agent Of Foreign Governments

According to John F. Moynihan, “OUR CONCLUSIONS,” “ ARE THIS -- FOREIGN AGENT. THE [CLINTON] FOUNDATION BEGAN ACTING AS AN AGENT OF FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS THROUGHOUT ITS LIFE AND CONTINUES TO DO SO.”

Sources:
• Video C-SPAN at https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4767629/clinton-foundation-acting-agent-foreign-governments
• Video YOUTUBE at https://youtu.be/qUYYxm0UF9A?t=8470
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

2. Multiple Instances Of Pay To Play With Clinton Foundation

Mr. Blum asks, “IN YOUR ANALYSIS DID YOU COME ACROSS WHAT APPEARED TO BE PAY-TO-PLAY [WITH THE CLINTON FOUNDATION]? I KNOW THAT WASN'T THE FOCUS BUT DID YOU COME ACROSS IT?“

According to John F. Moynihan, “TO BE CLEAR, TO BE VERY CLEAR, OUR FOCUS IS ON FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND WHETHER THEY LIVE WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES. AS PART AND PARCEL OF THAT INVESTIGATION, WE DID COME ACROSS INSTANCES OF [PAY-TO-PLAY WITH THE CLINTON FOUNDATION].”

For those not familiar with “Pay to play”, it means corruption. Find this Wikipedia article at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pay_to_play

Archived at http://archive.fo/rtpnf

Sources:
• Video C-SPAN at https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4767657/multiple-instances-pay-play-clinton-foundation
• Video YOUTUBE at https://youtu.be/qUYYxm0UF9A?t=9630
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

3. Clinton Foundation Misuse Of Donated Public Funds

According to Lawrence W. Doyle, “MISUSE OF DONATED PUBLIC FUNDS -- THE [CLINTON] FOUNDATION FALSELY TESTED THAT IT RECEIVED FUNDS AND USED THEM FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES. WHICH WAS IN FACT NOT THE CASE. RATHER, THE [CLINTON] FOUNDATION PURSUED AN ARRAY OF ACTIVITIES, BOTH DOMESTICALLY AND ABROAD. SOME MAY BE PHILANTHROPIC, ALBIE IT UNIMPROVED, WHILE -- ALBEIT UNIMPROVED, WHILE OTHERS ARE PROPERLY CHARACTERIZED AND TAXABLE UNDERTAKES OF PRIVATE ENTERPRISE, AGAIN, FAILING THE TESTS OF PHILANTHROPY REFERENCED ABOVE. THE INVESTIGATION CLEARLY DEMONSTRATES THE [CLINTON] FOUNDATION WAS NOT A CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION, PER SAY, BUT POINT OF FACT WAS A CLOSELY HELD FAMILY PARTNERSHIP. AS SUCH, IT WAS GOVERNED IN A FASHION IN WHICH IT SOUGHT IN LARGE MEASURE TO ADVANCE THE PERSONAL INTERESTS OF ITS PRINCIPALS [BILL CLINTON, CHELSEA CLINTON, HILLARY CLINTON]”

Sources:
• Video C-SPAN at https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4767635/clinton-foundation-misuse-donated-public-funds
• Video YOUTUBE at https://youtu.be/qUYYxm0UF9A?t=8558

For those not familiar with the term "principals", in this context, it means the owners of the Clinton Foundation. So Bill Clinton, Chelsea Clinton, Hillary Clinton, anyone else? Source:
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Foundation
______• http://archive.fo/4w4mA
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

4. Clinton Foundation Use Donations 60% Administration & 40% Programs

According to John F. Moynihan, about the Clinton Foundation use of donations, “OVERALL IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN ABOUT 40% BY OUR CALCULATIONS ENDED UP GOING TO [CHARITY] PROGRAMS AND 60% WAS [GOING TO] ADMINISTRATIVE [COST FOR THE CLINTON FOUNDATION].”

Sources:
• Video C-SPAN at https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4767653/clinton-foundation-donations-60-administration-40-programs
• Video YOUTUBE at https://youtu.be/qUYYxm0UF9A?t=9566

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

5. Clinton Foundation Brokering Money & Pharmaceuticals

Mr. Jordan asks, “YOU SAID IN YOUR OPENING STATEMENT YOU USED THE TERM [CLINTON FOUNDATION ACTING AS] AGENT OF A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT. GIVE ME AN EXAMPLE OF THAT. “

Lawrence W. Doyle replies, “SO REALLY, IF YOU WANT TO REDUCE THIS TO LAYMEN'S TERMS, [THE CLINTON FOUNDATION] WERE BROKERING MONEY AND BROKERING PHARMACEUTICALS. THAT'S A TERM ON WALL STREET WE USE, BROKERING, JOHN USES THE TERM AGENT, [THE CLINTON FOUNDATION] WERE AN AGENT OF MONEY THROUGH THESE DONORS, THEY WOULD TAKE A, FOR LACK OF A BETTER TERM, A VIG, IN TERM OF THEIR FEES, BROKER THE MONEY, AND THEN [THE CLINTON FOUNDATION] NEGOCIATED THOSE RELATIONSHIPS WITH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, BY THE SAME TOKEN [THE CLINTON FOUNDATION] WERE BROKERING THE PHARMACEUTICALS AND AGAIN TAKING THE [FEES/]VIG.”

Sources:
• Video C-SPAN at https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4767663/clinton-foundation-brokering-money-pharmaceuticals
• Video YOUTUBE at https://youtu.be/qUYYxm0UF9A?t=9716

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

6. Less than 0.1% Of Clinton Foundation Donors Gave 80% Of Money

According to Lawrence W. Doyle, “ON THAT NOTE, WE FOLLOWED THE MONEY SO WE MADE EXTENSIVE SPREADSHEETS OF [THE CLINTON FOUNDATION] REVENUES AND EXPENSES. WE ANALYZED [THE CLINTON FOUNDATION] INCOME STATEMENTS AND WE DID A MACROREVIEW OF ALL THEIR DONORS. IT'S A VERY BAR BELLED SORT OF FOUNDATION. LESS THAN .1% OF THE DONORS GAVE 80% OF THE MONEY. SO WE FOLLOWED THE MONEY. ”

Sources:
• Video C-SPAN at https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4767622/01-clinton-foundation-donors-gave-80-money
• Video YOUTUBE at https://youtu.be/qUYYxm0UF9A?t=8387
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

7. Clinton Foundation Operated Outside Bonds

According to John F. Moynihan, “OUR CLAIM IS A TAX CLAIM. IT'S A CLAIM OF PROBABLE CAUSE INDICATING THAT THE [CLINTON] FOUNDATION OPERATED OUTSIDE THE BOUNDS OF ITS APPROVAL THAT CAME FROM THE I.R.S. THAT'S OUR CLAIM.”

Sources:
• Video C-SPAN at https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4767614/clinton-foundation-operated-bonds
• Video YOUTUBE at https://youtu.be/qUYYxm0UF9A?t=8329

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

8. Clinton Foundation Modelled Global Fund In Geneva

According to John F. Moynihan, “WHAT HAPPENED HERE [WITH THE CLINTON FOUNDATION, IS THAT] FOR WHATEVER REASON WE DON'T KNOW AND DON'T HAVE AN OPINION ON IT, [THE CLINTON FOUNDATION] BECAME A HYBRID. AND IN OUR ANALYSIS SHOWS THAT THIS [THE CLINTON FOUNDATION] HYBRID MODELED THE GLOBAL FUND IN GENEVA, SWITZERLAND."
According to Lawrence W. Doyle, "THAT'S A HUGELY IMPORTANT POINT."

Sources:
• Video C-SPAN at https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4767676/clinton-foundation-modelled-global-fund-geneva
• Video YOUTUBE at https://youtu.be/qUYYxm0UF9A?t=9831

- - -

For those not familiar with the "Global Fund in Geneva", find this related Wikipedia article at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Global_Fund_to_Fight_AIDS,_Tuberculosis_and_Malaria

Archived at http://archive.fo/BYZ5r

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

9. Huge Probable Cause Of Wrong Doing By Clinton Foundation

Rep. Mark Meadows asks, "BASED ON YOUR FACTS DO YOU BELIEVE THERE'S PROBABLE CAUSE OF WRONG DOING [BY THE CLINTON FOUNDATION]?"

John F. Moynihan replies, "YES."

Lawrence W. Doyle replies, "HUGELY. YES."

Sources:
• Video C-SPAN at https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4767687/huge-probable-wrong-clinton-foundation
• Video YOUTUBE at https://youtu.be/qUYYxm0UF9A?t=9990
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Laws About Not-For-Profit Organization

501(c)(3) organizations such as Hillary's Clinton Foundation are not permitted to be organized or operated for the benefit of any private individual and are only permitted to engage in minimal political activity. When a nonprofit organization violates these terms, defrauds contributors, or engages in impermissible political activity, the IRS may revoke its tax exempt status.

Source at https://oversight.house.gov/hearing/oversight-of-nonprofit-organizations-a-case-study-on-the-clinton-foundation/

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Related Information

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

More

Read critics of Hillary Clinton's services as public servant at:

• https://www.minds.com/groups/profile/777046188208693266/

• https://www.facebook.com/groups/Hillary.Clinton.Critics/

Read critics of Donald Trump's administration services at:

• https://www.minds.com/groups/profile/804112862432178176

• https://www.facebook.com/groups/Donald.Trump.Critics/

Read critics of Jill Stein's services as public servant at:

• https://www.facebook.com/groups/Jill.Stein.Critics/

Read critics of Barack Obama's services as public servant at:

• https://www.minds.com/groups/profile/804113053598384128

• https://www.facebook.com/groups/Barack.Obama.Critics/

- - -

Comparison between the Green Party and other Parties at http://www.gp.org/the_real_difference

- - -

Will Trump's administration deliver their commitment to be Public-Servant, instead of Money-Servant? In other words, to serve the interests of the working citizens? Instead of serving money, corporate lobbyists, WallStreet banks, a few billionaires, or their self-interest. If Trump's administration fail their services, anyone else interested in being the next president and serve working citizens first? Any women interested? How about Jill Stein with the Green Party? Anyone else? If no women are interested, how about Bernie Sanders as independent candidate without the corrupted DNC? Which was bought by Hillary and is presently controlled by Hillary. Or how about another independent candidate? How about you?

- - -

For those not familiar with corporate lobbyists, read more at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lobbying_in_the_United_States#Lobbying_controversies

For those not familiar with the military–industrial complex, read more at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military%E2%80%93industrial_complex

For those not familiar with Hillary Clinton’s alleged “Entrapments” strategy, read more at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entrapment

For those not familiar with Hillary Clinton’s alleged “Projection Lying” strategy, read more at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

“Projection Lying” is called "reverse projection" in psychology and "transference" in espionage.

- - -

Any other women interested in being the next president? How about you?

Speaking for myself, I am 100% for a woman as president conditional to her serving you the working citizens. Instead of serving money. Same condition for any man president. Unfortunately Hillary Clinton past behaviors demonstrated that she served money, she does not serve you the working citizens. To her money is more important than you the working citizens. Find above information for supporting evidence. So Hillary current talk about serving working citizens as little or no credibility. I suggest to demand all presidential candidates to serve the interests of the working citizens of the United States, and not be tied or dependent on money from corporations or money from a few billionaires. Any other women interested in being the next president and serving working citizens, instead of serving money? How about Jill Stein? Anyone else? If no women are interested, how about Bernie Sanders? Or how about an independent candidate?

- - -

Friendica Or Diaspora*

Are you facing a challenge with censorship on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, or Minds.com? You might be interested in the censorship-free and community-owned code, and really decentralized social media with either Friendica or diaspora*. Both are free, and without censorship. Read more or join at:
• https://friendi.ca
or
• https://diasporafoundation.org

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -