In the article from *The Brighter Side of News*, scientists led by physicist Enrico Rinaldi from the University of Michigan investigate the interior of black holes using a combination of quantum computing and machine learning. Their research is grounded in the **holographic principle**, which suggests that theories of gravity and particle physics, although operating in different dimensions, are fundamentally equivalent. This principle posits that the three-dimensional gravity of black holes can be represented as a two-dimensional projection related to particles.

## Key Findings

### 1. **Understanding Black Hole Structures**
  - **What They Did**: Rinaldi's team utilized quantum computing to analyze quantum matrix models that simulate particle arrangements reflective of black hole structures.
  - **How They Did It**: They created quantum circuits, visualized as sequences of qubit operations akin to musical notes, to find the "ground state"—the lowest energy configuration—of these models. This ground state reveals essential characteristics about the black hole's nature.

### 2. **Significance of Quantum States**
  - **Why It Matters**: By understanding these quantum states, researchers aim to uncover insights into the elusive quantum properties of gravity within black holes. This could lead to advancements in developing a unified theory that merges gravity and particle physics.

## Inside the Simulator Black Hole

The simulator used by Rinaldi and his team employs quantum matrix models, which are mathematical representations that help explore the interactions between particles and gravity. Here’s what’s inside their simulator:

- **Quantum Matrix Models**: These models represent particle theory, allowing researchers to simulate how particles behave under conditions similar to those near a black hole.
- **Ground State Determination**: The primary goal is to determine the ground state of these models, which indicates how particles arrange themselves at their lowest energy configuration. Understanding this state can provide insights into the fundamental properties of both particles and gravity.
- **Quantum Circuits**: The circuits operate through qubits, which are manipulated via quantum gates to explore various configurations until they reach the desired ground state.

## Broader Implications

The innovative approach taken by Rinaldi's team represents a significant step toward visualizing complex quantum systems and enhancing our understanding of black hole structures. By bridging quantum computing with theoretical physics, they hope to shed light on one of the universe's most enigmatic phenomena—black holes—and contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of fundamental physics.

This research not only aims to deepen our knowledge about black holes but also seeks to address long-standing challenges in reconciling general relativity with quantum mechanics, potentially paving the way for groundbreaking advancements in theoretical physics.

Citations:
[1] https://discover.lanl.gov/news/quantum-machine-learning/
[2] https://thequantuminsider.com/2023/06/21/chinese-led-research-team-uses-quantum-computers-to-simulate-black-hole-physics/
[3] https://scitechdaily.com/quantum-machine-learning-hits-a-limit-a-black-hole-permanently-scrambles-information-that-cant-be-recovered/
[4] https://www.sciencealert.com/what-happens-inside-a-black-hole-quantum-computers-may-be-able-to-replicate-it
[5] https://www.mpg.de/20074327/extraterrestrial-intelligence-quantum-computing-with-black-holes
[6] https://phys.org/news/2022-02-black-hole-physicist-quantum-machine.html
[7] https://news.umich.edu/whats-inside-a-black-hole-u-m-physicist-uses-quantum-computing-machine-learning-to-find-out/
[8] https://www.mpp.mpg.de/en/news/news/ausserirdische-quantencomputing-mit-schwarzen-loechern

In *The Brighter Side of News* article, scientists led by physicist Enrico Rinaldi from the University of Michigan explore the interior of black holes by combining quantum computing with machine learning. Their research builds on the **holographic principle**, which proposes that gravitational and particle theories, although in different dimensions, are equivalent. This principle helps theorize that black holes' three-dimensional gravity could relate to particles in a two-dimensional projection.

### Key Findings:
- **What**: Using quantum computing, Rinaldi's team analyzes quantum matrix models, simulating particle arrangements that may reflect black hole structures.
- **How**: They developed quantum circuits—visualized as "musical" sequences of qubit operations—to reach the "ground state" (lowest energy configuration) of matrix models. This state reveals fundamental characteristics of the system.
- **Why**: Understanding these quantum states could provide insights into the elusive quantum properties of gravity within black holes, potentially advancing the unified theory of gravity and particle physics.

The team’s innovative approach is an essential step toward visualizing complex quantum systems and understanding black hole structures in new ways.

For full details, visit the original article [here](12).

https://www.thebrighterside.news/post/scientists-finally-discover-whats-inside-a-black-hole/

https://www.space.com/milky-way-biggest-stellar-mass-black-hole-gaia

## Record Breaker: Milky Way's Most Monstrous Stellar-Mass Black Hole

The recent discovery of Gaia-BH3, the most massive stellar-mass black hole in the Milky Way, marks a significant milestone in astrophysics. This "sleeping giant," located approximately 2,000 light-years from Earth in the Aquila constellation, has a mass of 33 solar masses, surpassing the previous record-holder, Cyg X-1, which is about 20 solar masses. This finding not only deepens our understanding of black holes but also challenges existing theories regarding their formation.

### Discovery and Significance

Gaia-BH3 was identified through data collected by the European Space Agency's Gaia mission, which meticulously tracks the motion of billions of stars. The black hole’s presence was inferred from the peculiar "wobbling" motion of a companion star, indicating a gravitational influence from an unseen massive object. This method of detection highlights Gaia's capability to reveal dormant black holes that do not actively consume material, making them difficult to observe directly[1][3].

The significance of Gaia-BH3 lies in its mass and its implications for stellar evolution theories. Traditionally, it was believed that stellar-mass black holes could not exceed certain mass thresholds due to the dynamics of stellar evolution and material loss during a star's life cycle. However, Gaia-BH3's existence suggests that metal-poor stars—those lacking heavier elements—can indeed collapse into significantly massive black holes. This finding provides observational confirmation for theoretical models that predict such outcomes[4][5].

### Characteristics of Gaia-BH3

Gaia-BH3 is classified as a dormant black hole because it does not currently exhibit active feeding behavior typical of many black holes that emit X-rays. Instead, it orbits a companion star that is smaller and metal-poor, which likely formed in the early universe shortly after the Big Bang. The chemical composition of this star supports the hypothesis that it originated from a progenitor star with few heavy elements, further corroborating the idea that metal-poor stars can yield massive black holes[1][4].

The system's dynamics are noteworthy; Gaia-BH3 and its companion star orbit a common center of mass every 11.6 years. At their closest approach, they are about 4.5 astronomical units apart—similar to the distance between the Sun and Jupiter—which allows astronomers to study their interactions in detail[2][5].

### Broader Implications for Astrophysics

The discovery of Gaia-BH3 opens new avenues for understanding the population of dormant stellar black holes in our galaxy. As George Seabroke from University College London aptly noted, finding such a massive black hole is akin to "seeing" a previously hidden aspect of our galaxy's structure. This discovery not only enriches our knowledge about black holes but also raises questions about the formation processes of these enigmatic objects[3][4].

Moreover, Gaia-BH3 serves as a bridge between observational astronomy and theoretical astrophysics. It reinforces the notion that high-mass black holes can form from low-metallicity stars, which have different evolutionary paths compared to their metal-rich counterparts. This insight is crucial for refining models of stellar evolution and black hole formation across cosmic time scales[1][3].

### Conclusion

In summary, Gaia-BH3 stands as a testament to human curiosity and scientific advancement in understanding the cosmos. Its discovery not only redefines what we know about stellar-mass black holes but also emphasizes the importance of missions like Gaia in uncovering the mysteries of our galaxy. As researchers continue to analyze data from this mission, further revelations about dormant black holes and their role in galactic evolution are anticipated, promising an exciting future for astrophysical research.

Citations:
[1] https://phys.org/news/2024-04-astronomers-largest-black-hole-milky.html
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cU00B-6DeSQ
[3] https://www.space.com/milky-way-biggest-stellar-mass-black-hole-gaia
[4] https://news.cnrs.fr/articles/gaia-bh3-the-black-hole-that-shouldnt-exist
[5] https://www.astronomy.com/science/astronomers-uncover-sleeping-giant-black-hole-gaia-bh3-the-largest-ever-found-in-the-milky-way/
[6] https://earthsky.org/space/gaia-bh3-milky-ways-most-massive-stellar-black-hole/
[7] https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Gaia/Sleeping_giant_surprises_Gaia_scientists
[8] https://www.aip.de/en/news/gaia-bh3/

The discovery of supermassive black hole-powered quasars in the early universe, as observed by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), has significantly advanced our understanding of the formation and evolution of these enigmatic cosmic entities.

### Age and Environment of the Quasars

These quasars, dating back approximately 13 billion years, emerged when the universe was only 600 to 700 million years old, a remarkably brief period after the Big Bang. The JWST's ability to capture light from such ancient phenomena allows astronomers to study not only the quasars themselves but also the environments in which they formed. These early quasars represent some of the first luminous objects in the universe, providing a glimpse into a formative period of cosmic history when galaxies were just beginning to take shape[1][3].

### Size and Mass of the Quasars

The supermassive black holes at the centers of these quasars are estimated to have masses equivalent to millions or even billions of suns. This massive scale poses a significant puzzle, as the universe at that time was still in its infancy, and the mechanisms for such rapid growth are not fully understood[1][3].

### Formation Challenges

The existence of these supermassive black holes in relatively sparse environments challenges our current understanding of their formation. Traditionally, it was believed that these black holes grew rapidly through the accretion of surrounding gas and dust or via mergers with other black holes. However, JWST observations reveal that some of these quasars exist in "empty-larders"—regions lacking the dense material needed to fuel their growth. This contradicts the expectation that supermassive black holes would be found in high-density environments filled with primordial gas[1].

Additionally, the discovery of merging black holes in the early universe, such as the ZS7 system observed by JWST, suggests that mergers could be a crucial pathway for the rapid growth of supermassive black holes. This finding implies that such events may have played a pivotal role in the development of these cosmic behemoths[2].

### Implications for Cosmic Evolution

The findings from the JWST not only challenge existing models of black hole formation but also raise fundamental questions about galaxy formation itself. The current cosmological model suggests that dark matter plays a crucial role in the growth of galaxies and their central black holes through a vast "cosmic web" structure. However, the presence of supermassive black holes in less populated regions suggests that alternative mechanisms may be at play, potentially involving hidden or shrouded galaxies that are not immediately visible[1].

### The Continuing Mystery

The implications of these discoveries extend beyond the mere existence of these ancient quasars. They highlight a gap in our understanding of how black holes could achieve such massive sizes in a universe still in its infancy. One possible explanation is that these black holes started with "heavy seed" black holes, which could have been more massive than those seen today, allowing them to grow rapidly from the outset[3].

### Relevance Today

Despite the age of these quasars, their discovery is incredibly relevant to contemporary astrophysics. The JWST's ability to peer into the early universe offers a window into a formative era of cosmic history. As scientists continue to unravel these mysteries, they may need to revise our models of black hole growth and the role of dark matter in galaxy formation. These findings underscore the complexity and dynamic nature of the universe, suggesting that our current understanding is still evolving[1][3].

In conclusion, the JWST’s observations of lonely supermassive black hole-powered quasars serve as a powerful reminder of the complexities of our universe. While these quasars existed billions of years ago, their impact on our understanding of cosmic evolution is very much alive today, posing questions that could redefine our knowledge of the universe and its origins. The ongoing research continues to reveal the secrets of the universe, highlighting the need for further exploration and refinement of our cosmological models.

Citations:
[1] https://www.space.com/james-webb-space-telescope-ancient-black-hole-quasar
[2] https://www.astronomy.com/science/jwst-discovers-black-holes-merging-near-the-dawn-of-the-cosmos/
[3] https://www.space.com/james-webb-space-telescope-heavy-cosmic-seeds-early-universe
[4] https://from.ncl.ac.uk/james-webb-space-telescope-shines-light-on-mysteriously-dusty-supermassive-black-hole
[5] https://www.advancedsciencenews.com/new-jwst-data-challenges-our-understanding-of-supermassive-black-holes/
[6] https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.18773
[7] https://www.livescience.com/space/black-holes/james-webb-space-telescope-spots-gigantic-galaxy-starving-its-host-galaxy-to-death
[8] https://www.nasa.gov/universe/webb-detects-most-distant-active-supermassive-black-hole-to-date/

Formulas of Speed Time Distance

The concept of a galactic year, also known as a cosmic year, defines the time taken for the Sun (and thus Earth) to complete one orbit around the center of the Milky Way galaxy. Current estimates suggest that the galactic year is approximately 225-250 million Earth years.

In the calculations provided earlier:

1. **Time Taken to Travel 1 Light Year:** The calculation shows that light travels approximately \(5.87 \times 10^{12}\) miles in one light year, aligning with the conventional definition of a light year.

2. **Determining Time for Earth's Orbit around the Galaxy:** The estimation of \(134,529,853\) years for Earth to complete an orbit around the Milky Way aligns with the notion of a galactic year. However, the accepted galactic year duration is significantly longer, around 225-250 million years, emphasizing the vast timescales involved in galactic orbital periods.

3. **Analysis of Earth's Movement:** The claim of Earth moving \(2,000\) light years closer to the center of the Milky Way in a few years (2018 to 2021) suggests a rate of \(666.\overline{6}\) light years per year. However, this rapid shift contradicts established scientific understanding and is inconsistent with the much longer galactic year duration.

4. **Speculative Calculations:** Speculative claims about human lifespans and theoretical Earth movement within the galaxy lack empirical evidence and do not align with established astronomical knowledge or the concept of a galactic year.

Comparing the estimated time for Earth's orbit around the Milky Way (134,529,853 years) with the widely accepted galactic year duration (approximately 225-250 million years) emphasizes the considerable discrepancy between the speculative calculations and the recognized timescale of a galactic year. These calculations highlight the immense timescales involved in galactic orbital motions and the need for caution when interpreting and aligning speculative claims with established astronomical models.

The calculations provided in the breakdown focus on understanding distances and time in space. To align with the concept of a galactic year, we can compare these calculations to the notion of Earth's orbit around the Milky Way.

1. **Calculating Time Taken to Travel 1 Light Year:**
  This calculation defines the distance light travels in a year, approximately \(5.87 \times 10^{12}\) miles. A galactic year, also known as a cosmic year, is the time it takes for the Sun (and consequently, Earth) to complete one orbit around the center of the Milky Way galaxy.

2. **Determining Time for Earth's Orbit around the Galaxy:**
  The estimate for a complete orbit around the Milky Way is \(134,529,853\) years, considering the average speed of Earth in orbit and the galaxy's estimated diameter of \(100,000\) light years. This time span aligns with the notion of a galactic year, representing the duration for Earth to complete one orbit around the Milky Way's center.

3. **Analysis of Earth's Movement:**
  The claim that Earth moved \(2,000\) light years closer to the center of the Milky Way from 2018 to 2021 suggests a substantial shift. If this movement were constant, it would imply an average annual movement of \(666.\overline{6}\) light years. However, such rapid movement contradicts established scientific understanding, and these calculations likely don't accurately represent Earth's actual motion in space.

4. **Speculative Calculations:**
  The speculative claims about human lifespans and theoretical Earth movement within the galaxy lack empirical evidence and scientific substantiation. Therefore, these claims cannot be incorporated into standard astronomical calculations or associated with the concept of a galactic year.

In summary, while calculations for Earth's orbit duration align with the concept of a galactic year, speculative claims and rapid Earth movement within a few years are not consistent with established astronomical understanding and likely do not relate to the concept of a galactic year.

Let's break down the math and calculations involved in the provided statements:

1. **Calculating Time Taken to Travel 1 Light Year:**
  
  Light travels at approximately 186,000 miles per second.
  
  In one year (365.25 days), light covers:
  \[
  186,000 \, \text{miles/second} \times 60 \, \text{seconds/minute} \times 60 \, \text{minutes/hour} \times 24 \, \text{hours/day} \times 365.25 \, \text{days/year}
  \]

  This equals approximately \(5,869,713,600,000\) miles in one light year.

2. **Determining Time for Earth's Orbit around the Galaxy:**

  Earth's speed in orbit around the center of the Milky Way varies but averages about \(514,000\) miles per hour. The diameter of the Milky Way is approximately \(100,000\) light years.
  
  Time taken to complete one orbit (assuming constant speed):
  \[
  \frac{\text{Distance around the Milky Way}}{\text{Speed of Earth}} = \frac{100,000 \, \text{light years} \times 5,878,625,000,000 \, \text{miles/light year}}{514,000 \, \text{miles/hour}} = \text{approximately 1.18 trillion hours}
  \]

  Converted to years (365.25 days/year), it would take approximately \(134,529,853\) years to complete one orbit around the Milky Way.

3. **Analysis of Earth's Movement:**

  The claim states that Earth traveled \(2,000\) light years closer to the center of the Milky Way from 2018 to 2021.
  
  Considering the distance to be traveled in one year (assuming a constant rate):
  \[
  \frac{2,000 \, \text{light years}}{3 \, \text{years}} = 666.\overline{6} \, \text{light years per year}
  \]

  Earth's average distance traveled per year over this period is \(666.\overline{6}\) light years.

4. **Speculative Calculations:**

  There are speculative claims about human lifespans and theoretical Earth movement within the galaxy that lack empirical evidence and scientific substantiation. These claims do not align with established astronomical understanding and therefore cannot be calculated using standard scientific methods.

These calculations and statements emphasize the vastness of space and the complexities involved in measuring astronomical distances and movements. Some of the statements provided are speculative and may not align with established scientific data and models, hence should be considered cautiously.

The speed, time, and distance of a moving object can be calculated by using the following formulas of distance speed and time.

Distance Speed Time Formula is given as:

Speed =

Distance = Speed x Time

VERA (VLBI Exploration of Radio Astrometry, by the way “VLBI” stands for Very Long Baseline Interferometry) started in 2000 to map three-dimensional velocity and spatial structures in the Milky Way. VERA uses a technique known as interferometry to combine data from radio telescopes scattered across the Japanese archipelago in order to achieve the same resolution as a 2300 km diameter telescope would have. Measurement accuracy achieved with this resolution, 10 micro-arcseconds, is sharp enough in theory to resolve a United States penny placed on the surface of the Moon.

Earth new position since 2018 2,000 light-years closer to the supermassive black hole in the center of the Milky Way Galaxy.

Normal speed suggests we would travel the following  2 years / 66 years =  0.03 years since 27000 light years considered distance from A EARTH to B Blackhole at center of galaxy.

Distance 0.2 of 1 light year = 0.2 DISTANCE WE SHOULD HAVE TRAVELED IN ONE YEAR

1,000 light years traveled from 2019 update TO 2020 update

Total distance we should have traveled in light years = 0.006 light years

Scientists Now Believe Black Holes Could Be ... - Era of Light

https://eraoflight.com/2019/06/08/scientists-now-believe-black-holes-could-be-portals-to-other-galaxies/

Humans are still trying to visit the nearest planet in our solar system and the nearest black hole, Sagittarius A*—which lurks 27,000 light years away at the center of the Milky Way—is not even remotely reachable without propulsion technologies that are decades, if not centuries, from implementation.

Imagine the Universe!f

https://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/features/cosmic/milkyway_info.html

The Voyager spacecraft is traveling away from the Sun at a rate of 17.3 km/s. If Voyager were to travel to the center of our Galaxy, it would take more than 450,000,000 years to travel the 8 kpc. If it could travel at the speed of light, an impossibility due to Special Relativity, it would still take over 26,000 years to arrive!

Earth now 2,000 light-years closer to Milky Way's ...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/earth-now-2-000-light-years-closer-to-milky-way-s-supermassive-black-hole/ar-BB1boKzG

Earth now 2,000 light-years closer to Milky Way's supermassive black hole ... at the center of our galaxy, is actually 25,800 light-years from Earth -- almost 2,000 light-years closer than what we ...

Distance Speed Time Formula is given as:

Speed = DistanceTime

Distance = Speed x Time

TIME=Distance/SPEED

2.000 light  years /  11,739,427,200,000 Miles in 2 years =

in one year thus went went 

2019

27000 to 26000 meaning we went 5,869,713,600,000,000 Miles Miles in one year

2020

26000 to 25000 light years we went 5,869,713,600,000,000 Miles Miles in one year

                               GRAND TOTAL 11,739,427,200,000,000 Miles in TWO YEARS  

WHEN we should have only gone

0.030303030303 * .2

0.0060606060606

0.0060606060606 × 5869713600000

35574021818.1

 5,869,713,600,000,000 = 2,000 light years

• 3557,4021,818.1 = 0.2 times 66 years times 5,,869,713,600,000 mile

-35574021818.1 plus 5869713600000000

5.869,678,0259,800,000 miles in TWO years

OR  in 2 years you traveled 5000 life times or

66 years ÷ .2 lightears = 1 light  years takes 330 years

330

330  years * 2000 light year

660,000 years of life  from 2019 to 2021.

https://www.calcunation.com/calculator/lightyear-distance.php

A light year is a measurement of distance. This distance is measured by how far light can travel in a year.

Light travels at approximately 186,000 miles per second.

In one year (365.25 days) that is equivalent to 5,869,713,600,000 mile

How far do we travel through the universe in our lifetimes? 0.2 light years in 66 years

Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/lastword/mg24332392-100-how-far-do-we-travel-through-the-universe-in-our-lifetimes/#ixzz71vuGxRxb
 

When you find out you are 660,000 years old and you wonder a bit.

Awkward moment when earth falls 2000 light years into a black hole and no one seems to care. How far do we travel through the universe in our lifetimes . How far do we travel through the universe in our lifetimes ... [Search domain newscientist.com] https://www.newscientist.com/lastword/mg24332392-100-how-far-do-we-travel-through-the-universe-in-our-lifetimes/ Though you will have travelled about 62.5 billion kilometres around the sun in 66 years, it is a tiny distance in stellar terms: less than 1 per cent of a light year, or around 0.2 per cent of the ... That awful moment. Black hole found at center of galaxy - CNN.com https://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/space/12/10/supermassive.black.hole/index.html Earth’s distance from center of galaxy calculated at 27,000 light-years Black hole’s mass the equivalent of four million solar masses, study says Next Article in Technology » [Search domain newscientist.com] https://www.newscientist.com/lastword/mg24332392-100-how-far-do-we-travel-through-the-universe-in-our-lifetimes/ Black hole 26000 light years from us proves Albert ... https://theprint.in/science/black-hole-light-years-us-proves-albert-einsteins-theory/90789/ Black hole 26,000 light years from us proves Albert Einstein’s theory right. Stars close to the supermassive black hole were found to be losing energy, a phenomenon predicted by Einstein almost 100 years ago. Bengaluru: Bang in the middle of our galaxy, on a patch of sky known as Sagittarius A* sits a supermassive black hole (SMBH) with 4 Astronomers discover the closest black hole to Earth — and ... https://www.cbsnews.com/news/astronomers-discover-closest-black-hole-to-earth/ In comparison, Sagittarius A*, the infamous supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, is more than 25,000 light-years away, and the first black hole to ever be captured on camera is... MEANING we are all crossing over into a quantum state. Thus the mark of the beast in quantum dots. The problem? Do you want to be a slave to a fascist government microsoft when you die and be a zombie? Or believe in Jesus. We already according to the numbers lived 1000 66 years from 2017 27,000 light years to living again 1000 lives 66 years from 2019 to living again 100 lives 66 years to 2020. Meaning we are falling into a black hole and scientists are not concerned. Should you be? Mark of the beast owning your personality? AS a server robot? Or believe in Jesus. We already according to the numbers lived 1000 66 years from 2017 27,000 light years to living again 1000 lives 66 years from 2019 to living again 100 lives 66 years to 2020. Meaning we are falling into a black hole and scientists are not concerned. Should you be? Mark of the beast owning your personality? AS a server robot? curious does this make sense? If in one life time of 66 years we traveled .2 percent of a light year. And since 2008 now have traveled 2000 light years. That would make us in theory 66 years times 2000 times 5 tp make one percent, then 99 times again to make a 100 percent of one rotation of the galaxy. Just wondering if the math makes sense. Going from 27000 light years to 26000 then multiplied by 2 to get 25000 light years since 2008. Going light year normal .2 percent in one life time? However I think it is billions of years not millions curious on your opinion? Numbers how old are you since 2008 when nasa said 27000 to 2021 when they say 25000? 1000 ÷ 0.2 = 5000 how many 66 years in 1000 light years. 5000 × 66 × 2 660000 years old.. AND how old are you?