You do not need nanobots. you are more like a garden. You need good food. You need different things on different days. a little sun. A little water. This is not a design flaw. it is wiser than perpetual sameness of a machine or nanobot. what you are makes you or breaks you. You are human not Cylon. Graphene Oxide (GO) Toxicity : Death by a Billion Cuts Researchers at the University of Almeria(in Spain) recently took a look at the Pfizer vaccine using scanning electron microscopy. Guess what they found? Graphene Oxide nanoparticles. A lot of them. So many that they haven’t yet found anything else. If their findings are confirmed, then it seems pretty clear that the symptoms which will be attributed to the next COVID “variants” are actually the result of graphene poisoning, and that the vaccines are chemical weapons. One of the specific effects of graphene poisoning is the development of protein “coronas”, which are accumulations of dead cell debris (aka."viruses") around the graphene nanoparticles. The famous “spike” protein perhaps? Graphene sheets are one atom thick. They are subtle knives sharp enough to slice through cell walls as well as through strands of DNA. The debris of cellular fragments resulting from this mechanical annihilation is frequently accompanied by oxidative stress and an extreme systemic immune response (known as a cytokine storm). Graphene nanoparticles spread readily throughout the body, traversing the blood brain barrier with ease. “Several typical mechanisms underlying GFN toxicity have been revealed, for instance, physical destruction, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis.” Graphene Oxide Toxicity Study (attachment and quote above) : https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/... Almeria University Report (translated from Spanish) : https://www.orwell.city/2021/07/unofficial-translation.html
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/09/22/facebook-fact-checkers-just-censored-peer-reviewed-science
USA Today admitted their error resulting in the removal of both the fact check rating on the article and the filter from News Busters’ Facebook page.
According to a study in PLOS (Public Library of Science) , Facebook Factcheckers are in error 37.22% of the time
https://lies.news/2020-07-13-facebook-fact-checkers-caught-making-wrong-fact-checks.html
If you think i post weird or conspiracies.. you should see what facebook hides from you..
https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1302315452503953412
https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1302262274580287493
https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1300442109660106760
https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1300594747848527879
https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1299718193287270414
Facebook Fact Checkers Just Censored Peer Reviewed Science=== According to a study in PLOS (Public Library of Science) , Facebook Factcheckers are in error 37.22% of the time
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › pmc › articles › PMC1182327
Published research findings are sometimes refuted by subsequent evidence, with ensuing confusion and disappointment. Refutation and controversy is seen across the range of research designs, from clinical trials and traditional epidemiological studies [] to the most modern molecular research [4,5].There is increasing concern that in modern research, false findings may be the majority or even ...