Fire Them All – Part 1

In COVID Canaduh Wild Guesses Equal Trusted Truth 

Courage is the bridge between knowing what is wrong and doing what is right. 

Early novel coronavirus (COVID-19) models projected around 2.2 million deaths out of a population of approximately 332.5 million in the United States.

I’m not sure of the exact projected totals nor the precise American population but this ratio results in a death percentage that is extraordinarily close to .666%, Satan’s infamous Number of the Beast.

Check the math for yourself; 332,500,000 * .00666 = 2,214,450.  The indisputable fact is this result rounds down to 2.2 million, a figure used prominently in the media’s COVID-19 campaign. 

Is the 666 just a coincidence?  Possibly, though I personally have doubts considering the scale of evil being done to humanity.  Coincidence or not, the 666 reference doesn’t matter one way or the other with respect to the point I’m going to make. 

Before I show why early coronavirus models couldn’t possibly be accurate, let’s assume for the moment that they were and ask the following simple question.  

According to the models, what percentage of the American people wouldn’t die from COVID-19?  

The answer is 100% - .666% = 99.334%. 

The U.S. government’s COVID-19 Response justification began with the understanding that model projections suggested that 99,334 out of every 100,000 people would NOT die from COVID-19. Do you not find it a large leap from there to we’re all at risk? 

So, even if the COVID-19 models were correct, wouldn’t that make the draconian COVID-19 Response that terrorized citizens, masked people up, locked people down, destroyed millions of jobs, killed small businesses, closed schools, shuttered huge cultural events, denied weddings, increased public and private debt, kept the aged isolated from family, and levied a slew of ridiculous, absurd rules and restrictions on everyone mostly irrelevant to 99.334% of the population?  

Am I reading it wrong? 

Did U.S. Governments not strip 100% of their citizens of their wealth, rights, freedoms, and futures to protect the weakest, most vulnerable .666% of their citizens?  As this small segment is comprised of those most likely to succumb to flu like diseases, doesn’t that guarantee that government would fail to meet the meager .666% savings regardless?  Again, am I missing something important? 

It is late March 2022 as I write this.  Here in Calgary Alberta, I see many high school students walking masked to and from school every day, and they are among the least likely individuals to die from COVID-19 and other flu like diseases.  The teachers are obviously doing quite the number on the minds of their young charges considering students are low risk and unlikely to fall into the less than 1% of deaths the models project would occur.  Maybe that 666 figure isn’t mere coincidence after all. 

Regardless, the original models were inaccurate because they could not possibly be accurate.  Why? If you recall, the specific description the coronavirus was given at the beginning was “novel”, meaning new and unknown.  This indicates the models were guessing at important factors such as infection and fatality rates and furthermore, at that point relevant data could not yet exist.  The models knew nothing real and therefore could not produce trustworthy projections.  This is an undeniable truth, but it didn’t slow government one little bit, did it? 

Speaking as a developer, models can be viewed as the interaction between three components: data, assumptions, and software logic.  If any of those three pieces are wrong, then any projections the models spew out will also be wrong.  This is simple common sense is it not? 

Furthermore, continuing to speak as a developer, models can be made to say whatever the modeler wishes them to say.  Imperial College London’s models could just have easily projected American novel coronavirus death totals of 2,200 or 22,000,000 though I suspect the former would not have triggered the COVID-19 Response and the latter would have triggered derisive laughter.  Neither, however, would have been useful to those desiring to acquire political power through the implementation of an illegitimate and unnecessary COVID-19 Response. 

The models were always going to be wrong, but our governments treated those wild guesses as trusted truth, and BOOM, they implemented the pre-planned, globally designed COVID-19 Response in a sure-to-fail attempt to save a sick and dying .666% of the population.  Incredible. 

Here is a piece that links to a report out of the UK reflects on the failings of the Sage committee where authorities admit their omicron models produced results that were “at variance with reality” due to “bad data”.  This is evidence of exactly what I just explained with regards to the original coronavirus models that guessed at assumptions and had no good data to begin with.  The original model projections were destined to produce projections that were at variance with reality, projections that could only be wrong.  Governments around the world justified action based on bogus model projections and I believe they know it. 

I simply don’t know what to call government actions in this affair other than ignorant, incompetent, insane, corrupt, a sign of puppetry, or all of the above.  The label doesn’t matter though, does it?   They did what they did, and they did so while knowing more than 99% of the people weren’t at risk of death. 

In addition, the truth of the matter is that the number of deaths in the U.S. is nowhere near 2.2 million, and the death count is dropping!  Weird, eh?  Both the CDC and State of Massachusetts have reduced their COVID-19 death counts.  They got it wrong!  Imagine that.  Incorrect model projections and incorrect death counts.  Should these types of issues not be expected when politicians implement incorrect policy?  The dropping death counts trend is likely to continue because all the States follow similar general guidelines, as does much of the world. 

Judging by the relative year-to-year stability of the overall mortality figures for 2020 it is likely that the real “COVID-19” numbers will fall to flu like levels as more and more governments are forced to admit they overstated death counts, meaning the original models will eventually be shown to have inflated the death count by a factor of 10 or more by the time the data is cleaned up further.  That said, we have a serious problem on the clean data front that I’ll identify shortly and fully explain in next Wednesday’s essay. 

When the COVID-19 story is fully revealed what the world will understand is that less than .1% of people were ever at risk of dying.  However, governments acted as if 100% of people were in grave danger.  In effect, to go from .1% to 100% they increased the risk threat of the disease in the minds of the people by a factor of a 1000, or 100,000%.  Hard to believe, I know, but once more, does the logic fail? 

One learning that we must embrace is the fact that our governments obviously serve other masters, and the fact is we will either deal with this Truth or we will continue to be dealt with in the same way we’ve been treated over the last two years.  Likely worse. 

Am I suggesting that the novel coronavirus models used to justify the global COVID-19 Response were mere speculation rather than factual understanding?  Not really, I’m outright stating with 100% conviction that because government treated wild model guesses as trusted truth, their implementation of the unnecessary “COVID-19 Response” was rooted in abject and total ignorance. And that is the best defense government has. 

They speculated and we, the people, paid a steep price in consequences.  As I’ve shown, and this is important to keep in mind, this Truth was knowable from the start.  If you give it any thought at all, you know that governments understood how painful lockdowns and other measures would be, and yet they made us suffer anyway.  Their actions are all based on un-provable guesses that no one has held them accountable to, at least to date.  We, the people, must stand up, shake off the apathy and inertia, and demand that accountability. 

You may not accept Satanic inspiration behind what has been done to the world in the name of COVID-19 and can ignore the “666” ratio in the original scare models, but you can’t ignore that the consequences of the COVID-19 Response have been sick, sick, sick.  When you fully consider cause and effect, those consequences include Prime Minister Trudeau’s invoking of “Emergency” measures to literally trample all over Canadian’s rights. 

(Update: this italicized was missed in original post.  My bad.

The Fake Narrative’s rejection of our Natural Immune Response.

Just as the Fake Climate Change Narrative ignores the Sun’s major impact on Climate Change to blame everything on CO2, the Fake COVID-19 Narrative rejected the powerful impact of our natural immune system to fight disease.  The reason for this was to place the burden for saving humanity on the political solution known as the COVID-19 Response.

This is no minor oopsie.  Let’s take a look at what this represents using the original model estimates above that admitted 99.334% of the US population would NOT die from COVID-19.  We’ll round that down to 99% which works in favor of the Fake Narrative.

That 99% survival rate directly represents the strength of our innate, natural Immune Response system.  By ignoring that massive factor, the Fake COVID-19 Narrative placed that entire burden on the COVID-19 Response.  By doing this the COVID-19 threat level was elevated from (less than) 1% to 100%, a factor of 100 or nearly 10,000%.

This massive 10,000% Deceit was an integral aspect of generating the unwarranted fear necessary to justify the totalitarian, illegitimate COVID-19 Response.  We aren’t talking hard to spot little white lies here.  This is a gargantuan size Deceit that politicians failed to notice. Sadly, most of society did too. )

The key conclusion is that the illegitimate COVID-19 Response should never have been imposed, the public’s fears were fueled by Fake News, and that governments should have understood this.   The key learning is that public safety was never the objective, the implementation of COVID-19 Response was.  Have you not wondered why a “two-week” political solution continues two years later?  The answer to how that has happened will be found in the next essay, “In COVID Canaduh 15 Equals 35”, a quick explanation of the PCR Test protocol whose use is one of the grossest frauds ever perpetrated against humanity and is the primary source of the data problem I alluded to earlier.

Now, at this point, if you can’t accept the Truth, you have a problem because you KNOW the Truth and your conscience will demand you deal with it.  One way is to allow the Truth to overcome and replace your current fearful beliefs, regardless of how strong a hold they have on you.  Hopefully, this will bolster your courage to the point you’ll be willing to cross the bridge between knowing what is wrong and doing what is right, a process that begins with rejecting all COVID-19 government rules and restrictions.  The world needs a majority of people to cross Courage bridge and say NO to Tyranny, and soon.  Hold your political representatives accountable by sharing what you now know to be the Truth. 

The other way to soothe your anxiety is to deny the Truth and continue to go with the flow or bury your head in the sand, thereby accepting a life of self-funded oppressive Tyranny.  Not just for yourself, but for future generations as well. 

If we don’t step up to do the right thing then the only people with anything to look forward to, beside the psychotics behind the COVID-19 fraud, are those who believe in Jesus and a life in the Light.  A life that will come only after suffering death in this growing global darkness. 

Walk the walk credibility 

You may be wondering why few shared this blindingly obvious perspective before?  Well, complete fear does mess up the mind.  Some tried to rebuff the COVID-19 Narrative, repeatedly.  Check out my published articles here and decide for yourself how well they’ve aged.  The direct COVID related pieces begin with “The Press Loves a Panic” and “The Fearona Virus”.  

How were my analyses generally received at the time?  For me, it went something like this. 

Pretty much everyone: That is a nice shiny hat you’ve got there. Tinfoil? 

Friends and family: How embarrassing! I wish he would shut up. 

Colleagues: What an idiot! 

It has not been an enjoyable experience but here is the thing about Truth. It is solid and unchanging. You can trust and build upon it because its foundation will not move; the same way you can trust 1 plus 1 will always equal 2. 

Facts and evidence don’t change the Truth, they expose it, and each exposure serves as additional proof of the veracity of my analytical methodology.  

What I mean by this is that while speaking against the COVID-19 Narrative was often personally painful, I also knew to expect the evidence proving the Truth would be revealed in time.  That evidence is leaking out now, even if people aren’t properly connecting the dots to grasp their shocking meaning quite yet.  Again, in time. 

Who would have guessed that tinfoil not only blocks Fake News Narratives from destroying understanding but also provides the courage to do what is right?  Maybe I should sell some shiny merch. 

I ask you to review the numbers above, and if you reject my rationale, to use the original model numbers admitting 99.334% of Americans wouldn’t die from COVID-19.  Look into a mirror and ask yourself, am I doing the right thing for myself, my family, and my country by complying with Tyranny’s illegitimate decrees? 

If you’ve stood on the sidelines so far, I’m asking you to stand up and fight for your children’s free future and to those already fighting to understand the importance of taking aim at the cause of the problems, the illegitimate Fake Narrative and political COVID-19 Response, rather than specific consequences such as masks or vaccines.  A major reason being that fighting consequences tends to legitimize the Fake Narrative while granting unwarranted credence to the COVID-19 Response, which is a serious tactical error most are making in this existential war on Liberty.  I would go as far to suggest that attacking consequences ensures we lose the war. 

Please share this essay with those you know, particularly with groups fighting for freedom, including Q followers, and any in positions of “authority” - police officers, teachers, preachers, doctors, nurses, pharmacists, journalists, judges, CEOs, and politicians at every level.  

Ask them to look into a mirror too. And do the right thing. Demand it. 

Stay tuned for Fire Them All – Part 2, “In COVID Canaduh 15 Equals 35”. I have more tinfoil for you, and it is even shinier!