During spring 2017 I played with a social networking product called Minds.com. For those not familiar with Minds, it is an increasingly popular free product similar to Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook. The following is my personal review of Minds.
I love Minds ♥. Minds is my third favourite alternative to Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook. There are a few challenges with Minds. But it is definitely still my third favourite. My first and second favourite social networking products are diaspora* at https://diasporafoundation.org and or Friendica at https://friendi.ca I'll write another blog about those.
For this review below I'll focus on Minds at https://www.minds.com
The Minds "Channel" is like the Facebook "Wall" or Diaspora* "Wall", or like your profile page with other tools. All content you post to your Minds Channel is public. If needed there is an handy "Mature" option. To blur those content for under age users. For the viewing permissions Facebook and Diaspora* are able to do more fined-grained permissions per user or per group of users. Put if you need all your Channel content to be public than Minds Channel is great.
Because all your content on your Channel is public that means any users is able to view and interact with your Channel content, vote up or down or comment. You are able to block other users from interacting with you. But you need to block them one by one. That might be challenging and time consuming if your need to block a large number of users. I found the Facebook and Diaspora* block method is much easier, you review for your approval your friend invite requests. After that if you approved, only your Facebook friends are able to view your Facebook "Wall" or Diaspora* "Wall". In other words, on your Minds Channel if you need to keep some content private from specific users you can not do that yet. As the permissions are not yet fine-grained per user.
When you block other Minds users, using the Block feature located on their Channel page, it stops them from interacting with you, and they can not comment on your content. But it does not prevent those blocked users from viewing your Channel public content, or voting up or down your content. But you can not see their votes.
Minds "Groups" are similar to Facebook "Groups" or Diaspora* "Groups". If you create a Minds Group. Anyone is able to join your Group. The Group administrator(s) is called "Admin"(s). Unfortunately the Group Admin(s) are not yet able to review for approval the requests to join that Group.
The risk is that your Minds Group could easily become overrun by robot spammer, or users with immature behaviors such as trolls. For example they could post large amount of inappropriate content to monetize or bully other members.
The Group Admin(s) are able to either block or permanently block those immature users. But you need to do that one by one, so that might be challenging and time consuming with large amount of immature users.
Minds Group might be a good match if you enjoy letting your Group members be self-organized with filtering in or out other members. Speaking for myself, as Group Admin, I suggested to my Group members if they feel offended by another member, to express that to the other member. He/She might or not choose to take into consideration their feelings and potentially adapt her/his behaviors accordingly when appropriate. But if healthy two-way communications failed and the Group member still feel offended by the other member, I suggested for them to consider blocking that other member. As a result the other member would no longer be able to interact with them.
As you know Minds software is available in either decentralized or centralized options. Meaning its source code is available publicly for reviews and contributions. But is Minds software presently able to be both distributed and federated? I searched but I have not yet found a clear answer to that question. My instinct tells me the future is with those two combined network methods. Read more about the definition of distributed and federated networks at:
Thanks to Minds code being community-owned, instead of corporate-owned, and Minds culture that encourages full and real freedom of speech, I feel that my public content is well protected from censorship interference. For this I love Minds way better than Facebook, Twitter, YouTube with their increasing censorship. I noticed that people have expressed an increasing need for community-owned software. So my instinct tells me that on the long term Minds' strategy is potentially a winning one. To the expense of corporate-owned software. By "community-owned" I mean that Minds software code is Free and Open Source.
For publishing my public content I prefer to post first to Minds. Instead of Facebook, Tweeter, YouTube. After I posted my public content to Minds, I'm able to quickly and easily share it or re-post it to Facebook, Tweeter, YouTube, or other tools. There are many ways to use Minds. For example if I need to promote a public product digital brand. Minds is best. Including both personal or business public digital brand.
For publishing my private content Minds is not yet my favourite. Maybe later when the viewing permissions are more fined-grained with various privacy settings. Such as Public, Friends, Friends except, Only me, Custom. For now I prefer posting my private content to Diaspora* https://diasporafoundation.org and or Friendica at https://friendi.ca
Both are able to do various privacy settings.
Of course my personal review is based on my personal needs. To each their own needs. So what I love with Minds or found challenging is likely to be different for you. I believe that diversity is a strength.
Enjoy Minds :)
Francois
- - -
Disclaimer: After I wrote this review, I financially invested in Minds
- - -
Are you facing a challenge with censorship on Facebook, YouTube, or Twitter? You might be interested in the censorship-free and community-owned code with Minds at https://www.minds.com/register;referrer=Francewhoa
Are you facing a challenge with censorship on Minds.com? You might be interested in the censorship-free and community-owned code, and really decentralized social media with diaspora* at https://diasporafoundation.org and or Friendica at https://friendi.ca
Both diaspora* and Friendica are really fully free from interference by investors.