12/14/17: The FCC and Net Neutrality
As many of you know the FCC just voted to repeal Obama's title II framework regarding Net Neutrality. The tool which I believe was what bound edge providers and ISPs from being able to do anything when ICANN was on the chopping block in 2016 for a multinational committee (which was turned over to the U.N.). Congress were the one's responsible for letting Obama do what he did, but along with a government shutdown there was always the ability to wrangle ISPs as "arm benders" in order to strengthen congressional support of a counter action against Barry.
Additionally, if you take the time to examine the "Enhanced Transparency and Scope of the Rules" within the document itself, you can see how the title III bleed over into government monitoring of the goings-on within content provider activity.
I had tweeted this on Dec 13th 2017:
Ask yourself this, did you support US ownership of #ICANN back in 2016? If not, then please forever be silent on issues of a "free" internet. Most of you weren't aware of the travesty of Obama surrendering ICANN to a multinational coalition. This would be orchestrated. Back in 2015 when Obama officially put #netneutrality on the books it wasn't really on anyone's radar. A form of digital prsctice had kept ISPs and Edge providers in check prior to this order, so creating an official order on the books didn't seem like a big deal. But my theory is Obama had the plan in mind to surrender ICANN to a rootless multinational cosmopolitan force (e.g. U.N.) as a long term goal. By executive order he stripped these edge providers from the ability to fight back along with ISPs before he made his move. With Homeland, the FBI, and the NSA working with social media giants and meta data providers, the "content providers" of the internet were already going to keep quite as he did this. They wouldn't jeopardize their government relations. Besides Zucc and the others had no issues with censorship at the will of certain government regimes. Hence Facebook in Germany and the U.K. working to undermine political groups. The real kicker in this is that #netneutrality is utterly worthless as a policy. You are fretting over the tool which was used to siege the ISPs back when the real fight for a #freeinternet took place. How foolish does this look?
So in the end, what does this mean? Nothing really, an old tool of an old administration is being overturned and digital reciprocity will take back over governing ISP and edge provider behavior. Digitally Assured Destruction is also a possibility with content platform providers and the ISPs, now. In my opinion, a great thing in the age of censorship of right leaning peoples. Sit back, relax, and do not fret some ridiculous Netflix bandwith charging fee, it isn't coming anytime soon.
________________________________________________________________________________________
Sources:
http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/13/technology/fcc-releases-net-neutrality-rules.html
https://www.icann.org/
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/29/icann-un-take-internet-oct-1/
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/09/28/obamas-internet-surrender-must-stopped-icann/
________________________________________________________________________________________
Market Right updates can be found here --> https://www.minds.com/blog/owner