... TAX: Your earnings aren't yours. Your body performed labor to produce or acquire the fruits thereof. Taxation is a claim of ownership upon the fruits of your labor. Your body performed labor to acquire the fruits thereof. That is a claim of ownership upon your body. Sales taxes are also licensure LICENSURE: Your actions aren't yours. You're not initiating harm and want to do something with what you own that you have a right to do. Licensure is a claim of ownership upon your actions you can or can't take, denying you the right, whereby you need to beg me to let you do something, and pay to get permission. This is a claim to own your rights, actions you can take, and body that creates those actions. PROHIBITION: Your body isn’t yours. You want to put something into your body that you own. Prohibition is a claim of ownership upon your body itself by denying you the right to do what you want with your body, as you are the only one who can own yourself and make that decision. CLAIMS OF OWNERSHIP UPON YOUR BODY IS CALLED SLAVERY! What happens if you don’t comply with or obey the government's claims of ownership upon you? More claims of slavery and violation of Natural Rights/Law. Taxation, licensure and prohibition are all enforced by the threat of greater violence upon you if you don’t comply, ultimately at the point of a gun. This is coercion to deny your Right to your free will choice of your actions that don't initiate harm to others. Since this is a constant in life, we live in constant duress. “Your will doesn’t matter. Do what | command of you. You must do what | will you to do. My will supercedes your will. If you deny my claim of ownership and enslavement upon you, my act of violence, then | will send my order following enforcers to put you in a cage for not obeying. If you defend yourself against this further violence, you will be ‘legally’ assaulted or murdered.” - The Psychopath SOCIETY OF SLAVERY BELIEVERS: Believe in the “right” to: Steal property from others who didn't initiate harm (taxation) make someone ask you for permission and pay for license to do something that doesn't initiate harm (licensure) Stop others from doing things that don't initiate harm (licensure, prohibition) disallow others from putting things in their own bodies (prohibition) make others put things in their own bodies (mandates) make people do things against their will who don't initiate harm (all of the above) command/control others who don't initiate harm (government, authority) curtail other people's rights (government) initiate harm to those who disobey another's decreed beliefs (government) Someone else decides for you what you are or aren't allowed to keep, do or ingest. Believing in the “right” of authority/slavery makes you an immoral person. These are not “rights”, but delusional beliefs from a deranged perception of right vs. wrong. Consciousness becomes diseased and creates external chaos. Maybe you’re not doing the direct initiation of harm yourself, but you're Supporting, upholding and legitimizing that others do immorality. Your words or beliefs advocate for immoral actions. Voting condones that violence, destroying human freedom (creating evil). It’s not hard to understand what is best for each individual and society as a whole: respect each other’s rights which means the right to be free from the initiation of harm. Yet, government goes against this simple truth. This is how our society is currently opreating: insanity. The legislative, judicial and executive branches are like a 3-headed hydra dividing up the power of how to rule and control the rest. HOW MUCH THEFT IS TOO MUCH? Do you care if someone is stealing from you? At what point does someone stealing from you matter to you? Would it matter if they were stealing daily? What about once a month? Once a year? At what frequency or quantity would it stop to matter? You might not think you're being stolen from, but you are. We live in societies that currently have thievery as part of the foundation, with most of it sanctioned and even championed by the populace. Government operates as covert slavery. We allow theft to ourselves, as long as it’s not too much for us to tolerate. When it increases we protest and beg for things to go back to the previous level of enslavement. The more covert or occulted the method of enslavement, the more effective it is at 1) being unperceived as slavery and 2) persisting slavery as a way Of life. OVERT SLAVERY DIFFICULTY: Overt slavery is too hard to maintain over time as the injustice becomes obvious. When | look at recorded alleged history, | see a struggle for more morality and freedom to emerge. Many people, both those who are overtly enslaved and those who aren't, act to stop the overt slavery. They rebel, revolt, create uprisings, etc., all of which is dangerous to the oppressors. They often lose their heads, literally. There is a better way to rule, control, steal and leach as a parasite to get others to do work for you: give them more “freedoms”, convince them they are now “free” without them actually being truly free. Then they don’t rebel as much, because they think they have Freedom. They can't see the chains of their enslavement. They aren't beaten as much or in the same way (obfuscation), so long as they “obey the law” of the new masters. They also keep themselves in line much of the time due to the fear of “dangerous” freedom. They crave security, safety and the “authority” that pretends to provide them with (false) “law” and “order”. BELIEF IN AUTHORITY: The main definition of authority relates to “the power or right to give orders, make decisions (for others to follow), and enforce obedience”, i.e. people in positions of power like politicians, police, etc. Other uses relate to an authoritative source of information, such as someone viewed as an expert on a subject. But it’s all just perceived authority. In all cases the expectation is that an authority's word is taken as the way reality is (or must be). The most egregious expression is the superstitious construct of government (and government workers), and the perceived legitimacy of power to control or rule others by enforcing obedience to their commands, as if it’s actually a “right” they have. They have (illegitimate or immoral) power, Sure, but they never have that as a “right”. Neither is anyone obligated to be “obedient” to the so-called “laws” they decide to invent. No one has a right to control non-violent people, nor invent “laws” to be obeyed. BELIEF IN AUTHORITY MAKES YOU A SLAVE: Authority to control is about some telling others what to do by giving orders or commands of compliance. Others are expected to comply and obey, or face negative consequences for refusing. It’s saying your actions are subserviant to another's will. They decide what your behavior will be. What you rightfully do with your body (actions) is not yours to decide. The authority decides what you can or can’t do with your body. They are claiming ownership of actions that come from your body, and hence claiming ownership of your body. Accepting authority to control is to accept being owned by another, to accept being a slave. Experts — the other form of perceived authority — can give suggestions, recommendations, or make claims of truth. But each individual has to make their own decision as to what they do, and discern for themselves if something is true or not, not simply do it or believe it to be true because an authority said or wrote it. Even without the authority to control, if you simply accept the word of perceived authorities as truth, then you're in mental slavery, in thrall. BELIEF IN AUTHORITY MAKES YOU IMMORAL: Belief in authority (BIA) not only makes you a S/ave, it also makes you immoral. Belief informs behavior. BIA leads to the behavior of supporting/condoning the actions of authorities to rule and do violence to others. How many people are there that give excuses and justifications for what authorities do? If no one believed the authority to rule/control was /egitimate, then there would be no sustained support (justifications) for the persistent immorality they create, nor the resulting condition of slavery at various levels (Severity of harm and quantities accepted). Without this belief, wouldn’t people be more prone to think for themselves, rather than accept the thoughts of the “authorities” or “experts”? Police, politicians, doctors, or anyone in “authority” can try to punish you for not taking their word as truth, or their will as your will to direct your behavior as demanded. If you don’t do what they say, they punish you. There are so many instances where the pursuit of one’s own will that doesn't initiate harm will have retaliatory consequences imposed by “authorities” who expect obedience. BELIEF IN AUTHORITY MAKES YOU AN UNTHINKING ROBOT: BIA makes robots: unthinking automatons that go from stimulus (the reception of a command from an order giver) to response (obedience to the order, i.e. order following), not using the ability to stop and think before acting (not thinking). The robot mind is the slave mind. The slave assumes authority is truth and does as they are told. It's a stimulus-response process devoid of higher thought in between. Collectivism is similar, as you don't think for yourself as an individual and accept the consensus trance that capitulates to authority, becoming controlled and subjugated to that authority. The BIA is a mind-virus that blinds one from seeing and recognizing the immorality of what it represents and the condition of slavery it creates. This is the problem: the incorrect perception that authority is an acceptable, legitimate way to live. The remedy for this robotic thoughtlessness and ignorance is learning. Consciousness is used in a fuller capacity to gain awareness of information/knowledge. Thoughts about knowledge need to be put between Stimulus and response. Question authority, not just accept what they say. BLINDED BY AUTHORITY ORDER-FOLLOWING: Actions don't change from being good to bad, right to wrong, or vice versa, based on whether you did it yourself, or were told to do it by someone else out of fear, for money/gain or any other reason. The Milgram Experiments showed that people do things that initiate harm to others, whether they are aware of it being wrong or not when they do it. Many people do immoral actions because an authority says it's “ok” to do, as if that absolves them of the personal responsibility for doing it. Obedience to authority has people do immoral actions that they would not otherwise do on their own. They don't do what they would normally do of their own will using their own judgment. Instead, they do what the will and judgment of authority tells them to do, even if they know its wrong and don't want to do it, they press on because authority said so. Belief in and obedience to authority is what gets many people to do immorality to others. It’s a disease of the psyche. ABDICATING PERSONAL RESPONSIBLITY: Apart from the belief that you have the “right” to do violence to others, one of the main deceptions of the belief in authority to get people to initiate harm against others, is convincing them to believe they can give over personal responsibility for their actions to someone else. “/’m just doing my job (I'm not responsible). Take it up with the politicians, not me (but obey my commands and accept my violation of your rights, or else).” They believe — and expect others to believe — that someone else is responsible for their actions, as if they are just a robot or puppet being moved by the will of others. That’s how in thrall their consciousness Is. Looking at what we have created as a way of life, you can tell where the average person stands in knowing how Natural Law works. The Milgram Experiments (willingness to obey authority) and the Stanford Prison Experiments (willingness to be an authority to contro! others) are an indicator. Know-nothings who say no-to-nothing from perceived authorities (for the most part). COLLECTIVISM GROUPTHINK EXPERIMENT: Another experiment in obeying authority by giving over or abandoning oneself and one’s self to groupthink collectivism, is the Third Wave. A teacher gave certain teenagers ideas of belonging to something that alleged to be creating a better future (but devoid of the understanding of moral rights and wrongs). Those in the in-group of the ideology began mistreating those in the out-group for not being part of their collective ideology. They gave their individual thinking over to groupthink, not thinking for themselves if what they were doing was right or wrong, justifying the means by the idea of their ends. This is what has happened throughout history with leaders (authorities, rulers) who convince people that they are going to be part of something “great”, something “good” that will make the world better. So they give themselves over to the ideology and do evil acts under the belief of an “greater good” coming into existence. (Trostky, Mao, Hitler, etc.) AUTHORITY'S CLAIMS: Coerce others (violence) to do things against their will Deny others the right to do things that don't initiate harm Monopoly on violence: only their coerced services are legitimate to deal with violations; we can’t use other services to deal with violations Deny us rights that they claim only they have; different classes of people that have different “rights”, i.e. Animal Farm Deny others the right to defend themselves against this violence Those who refuse to obey will have more violence conducted upon them. Refuse taxation theft? Get locked in a cage. Defend yourself against their violence? Get assaulted or murdered. Translation: “You're my slave.” "I'm in charge. You will do what | say. If you don't, | will do other, more severe, violence against you." “You must obey me, otherwise | have the right to commit violence against you." AUTHORITY'S CLAIMS: The belief in the legitimacy of authority to control others who don't initiate harm is not a true claim. It’s a claim of ownership upon others, which is illegitimate. It’s a false claim made from a sick consciousness, a deluded mind. It's psychopathic to think you have a “right” to be a master/ruler over others. It’s a disease of thinking you can make things become true just because you say so. Twisted minds created it. Twisted minds continue to use it to dominate over others. Twisted minds believe it's true and accept that this way of life is moral, natural or necessary. The belief in authority warps our reality into an unreal way of life that doesn’t make sense. Yet, people believe this nonsense. And it’s not just the claim/belief in the legitimacy/"right” to control others. Many people are obedient to all forms of perceived “authority”. They blindly believe what “authorities” say because an “authority” said it. LEGITIMATE AUTHORITY: YOU ARE THE AUTHORITY OF YOU, UNDER MORAL TRUTH: AS an individual, the only authority you have is over yourself; to be a master of yourself, not others. Anything you create makes you the author of that creation. You author your life. Being an authentic author is to not just follow other people, what they do or say, but to determine truth to guide behavior by verification. False inauthentic “authority” is the external authority of control over others (violence). To accept/obey that “authority” is to subsume our innate authenticity (to truth) and authorship to be our own authority in creating our lives. They author a narrative for us to buy into. We then live their story, and they remain the author and authority over their version of reality that we live and create more of. Truth, reality, existence, nature, is the only authority above you. Authentic living is doing your best to know the current reality (what is) and what ought/should be actualized into reality (morality), to create a world according to authentic, real, genuine, true (maa) moral living. AUTHORITY'S MORAL CULPABILITY: ORDER GIVERS: Advocate for immorality by working to get others to do the immoral action they want to be created into existence Not creating the specific immoral action themselves, but they want it to be created by someone els Use their will + action (voice, money, threats) to get that immoral action created into existence Less morally culpable (not 0 culpability for the immorality that is created) e.g. “| want you to do something, and you agree to do it for X reason(s). | want, you do.” ORDER FOLLOWERS: Influenced by others to do the immoral action that they want to be created into existence Accept to subsume their will to the will of others for favorable personal outcomes (money, promotion, acceptance) Use their will + action to directly create an immoral action into existence More morally culpable because they directly create the immorality e.g. “You want me to do something, and | agree to do it for X reason(s). You want, | do. Maybe if it’s very immoral | won't do it.” SLAVERY BASIC DICTIONARY/ETYMOLOGY DEFINITION: SLAVERY: “state of servitude, condition of a slave” SLAVE: “person who ts the chattel or property of another” PROPERTY: “things subject to ownership” Own: “to possess, have; rule, be in command of, have authority over;” By the standard definitions, slavery is when there is the condition of being a Slave. A slave is when someone is the property of another; someone owns another and has the authority to rule over them and command them to do certain things (or not do certain things). This implies an obligation of obedience on the part of the slave. Is this an accurate definition? Can someone actually be the property of another? Continue: https://thegreatwork208716197.wordpress.com/2024/10/19/how-we-are-currently-being-enslaved-in-society/ The-Great-Work: https://thegreatwork208716197.wordpress.com Minds: https://www.minds.com/MindCom/?referrer=MindCom Mewe: https://mewe.com/the_great_work.82 Substack: https://thegreatwork.substack.com Gab: https://gab.com/SovereignLightWarrior Librti: https://librti.com/The-Great-Work The-Great-Work:Telegram-channel: https://t.me/the_greatwork BTS:Telegram: https://t.me/break_the_spell_group BTS:Mewe: https://mewe.com/join/breakthespell1 BTS:Minds: https://www.minds.com/group/777125552996753423.
