November 14, 2020 thousands descended on Washington DC to protest obvious election fraud.
For those that don’t know, or doubting, there was indeed fraud of many sorts: Post-office box and business-suite “residences”, illegal immigrant votes, and ballots to prisons have all be documented. There is also intimidation of republican observers, documented on video posted to the internet and in some news broadcasts local to their areas. For those doubting the “suitcase ballots” out of Georgia, a debunking of the “debunking” can be found here: [https://thefederalist.com/2020/12/07/no-the-georgia-vote-counting-video-was-not-debunked-not-even-close/]. Never mind, the chain of custody can’t be verified [https://www.theepochtimes.com/georgia-county-cant-find-chain-of-custody-records-for-absentee-ballots_3606540.html]
But wait, there’s more: Statistical anomalies, from the “midnight spike” of Biden votes, to 19 out of 20 bellwether counties being overwhelmingly wrong in picking the president. We’re talking odds greater than winning the lottery. In my own area, we know Philadelphia is corrupt to the core with some districts having zero — again improbably — republican votes. Philly is notorious that way.
The 2020 presidential election was a shit show, and even plenty of people who don’t like nor voted for Trump know it. Of the percentages I’ve seen bandied about, at least 30% of the voters registered as Democrat think there was fraud; the republican percentage approaches 80% (libertarians think all elections are frauds). The difference is, some of them are quite happy to accept the fraud, and smile to their friends, and even gloatingly smirk to their political opposition with this knowledge. It’s infuriating for those that really believe in “fairness” and/or have been subjected to similar slights, whether in business or over a board game. Ironically, it’s the “fair share of taxes” crowd that wax most enthusiastic over cheating.
So, a week after the election thousands flocked to the nation’s capitol to protest the fraud. The hope, I think, was the rest of the country would take notice, and cheer them on. Perhaps letters to the editor would be written, Facebook flame-wars would be started, videos made, twitters tweeting, and redditors redditing. For every person that marched in Washington I guesstimate there’s at least another 2-3 that felt the same fury, but didn’t have the means or time to join the fray. I think it’s likely there were 3-4 people for each one of those who felt the same but, for whatever reason remain quiescent. I, personally, have a friend that remains quiet on her politics because her employment situation would be uncomfortable (to say the least) were they known.
There’s something all these people dissatisfied with the election are failing to understand: they aren’t being seen. Unlike the BLM protests that got stage managed and promoted as legitimate, non-covid-spreading events, the media has no interest in spreading their story. During these protests in November I listened for a few minutes to the Right Side Broadcasting (RSB) live-stream. Between on the street interviews, they noted the local news was advising motorists away from jammed streets, but not saying why. No mention whatsoever of the protest, let alone why the protest was occurring.
This is the sort of thing that affects every legitimate protest. Among the demonized protests, you should include religious liberty protests, anti-abortion protests, second amendment protests, and, yes, even those against troubling qualified immunity for bad cops.
The question is, what have you done about it? Dan Bongino, current conservative darling, seems to think running to Parler and Rumble will “show them”. He seems to think running video on a YouTube competitor while bursting out short snippets of text on Parler is a viable form of “protest.” It isn’t.
The problem with running to another platform as a form of protest is you are, in effect, running away. When you do that, your message to the faceless masses gets lost. If you’re not there, who is going to listen? In your absence, it becomes easier for the opposition – in this case, big tech and legacy media – to malign you and your message, further eroding your credibility. You just have to look at what’s being said about Alex Jones or Stephan Molyneux to understand that. While I may not agree with all of what they say, they make valid points. Points that can’t be argued, debated or discussed because half the argument has been disappeared from the most visible tech platforms; points that are wholly misrepresented in the vacuum.
What’s more, within the realm of internet platforms, alternatives to “big tech” are being maligned as “Alt-right, bigot echochambers.” Parler recently had a hit piece run through the NY times, GAB has been cursed with the “white supremacy” epithet and, no doubt, they are drumming up anti-Rumble pieces while I type.
As I write this, December 12, there is another march on Washington with thousands in attendence. Almost a month after the November march, more people, even more angry, are marching in Washington DC to protest election fraud. Many will have facts on their side: statistics, even more proof of Dominion machine chicanery, more affadavits of ballot harvesting, more video of how easily an election worker can change votes.
And that, too, won’t be seen. The orthodox Jews being persecuted in DeBlasio’s New York aren’t being seen. Also invisible is the Migrant surge happening now on America’s southern border. Behind the media veil is Virginia’s end-run around the second amendment and it’s supporters. The real science of the Wuhan flu – hydroxychloroquine’s efficacy, mask mandates and economically devastating lock-down measures – aren’t even whispered; ignored for the profit-machine known as “panic-porn.” How many news stories have you seen about Australia halting vaccination because of “false positives” for HIV? Did you catch England recommending pregnant women, or people under 16 not get a vaccine? Previously buried information on Hunter Biden’s illegalities, that weren’t touched prior to the election, are only surfacing now, I presume, because Joe’s utility is over and by illness or scandal is ready to be removed – negating any legitimacy his “election” may have had. And it’s all being stage managed by the powers that shouldn’t be, to control us, to control and contain the ideals of America.
Where are the orders coming from? Who knows. What I do know, is if by design or coincidence, the matter is moot as long as we depend on the corporate media. Google, facebook, twitter have actively conspired to silence voices that don’t agree with their politics, handily helped by a journalist class that presume to know what is good for us. They don’t think we should be aware of problems with PCR testing; they don’t think we should have known about Gropin’ Joe’s exposure to blackmail; they don’t think we should know the false science behind lock-downs; they don’t think we should know the weak evidence behind all masks all the time; they don’t think we should have any say in how this pandemic should get managed; they don’t think we need to be reminded the fatality rate is low for most people. They don’t care how many people protest, because they will never allow it to be seen.
But, you cry, what else can we do? Nothing seems to work in this environment. Nobody is going to hear us, no one is going to care, and there are too many people asleep to what’s really going on. What difference can I make?
There is huge difference to be made, and we can make it, but we have to work together. Join me in #BlankOutCensorship, a direct attack on the media, censorship and the current elitist system as a whole.
Here is how it works:
First, blank out your avatar. It may seem small and insignificant, but it’s a way to be seen. Whatever picture you have to represent you on the big tech platforms, replace it with a blank space. Not black, not red, not a multi-colored gay flag, not a circle-slash-line like you see banning smoking, not even a shit emoticon. A blank space. Whitespace. Nada. When asked why your avatar is blank, state plainly “I don’t trust the media. I don’t trust big tech. I don’t trust politicians and I don’t trust who bought them.”
While we are all locked in our homes, while we are forced into zoom meetings, financing Netflix and Amazon, we can show them we know they’re lying and manipulating us. The television may cut away from the thousands rallied in Washington today; ignore the affidavits presented in various forums; pretend the intimidation of ballot observers didn’t happen, but as more blank spaces show up in Twitter/facebook/Google [YouTube] we can put them on notice: WE KNOW THEY ARE LYING TO US.
To work, everyone that cares needs to blank out. That’s how we can be seen. While the media can hide the crowds gathered in Washington – and Venezuela; Paris; Australia; Britain – it can’t hide the crowds online. People who would ignore our grievances would be forced to see how many share them. More importantly, the media would have to come up with some sort of expression as to WHY people are blanking.
So we tell them, unequivocally: we can’t trust you. You’ve lied to us too often. You have proven you do not deal in fact or science. And, by extension, we can’t trust the politicians you parrot. Blanking out can be a statement to the Gavin Newsomes and Gretchen Witmers. It can say “we’re fed up with these lies. While Newsome dined elegantly at a french restaurant, he shut down smaller businesses for an end I cannot fathom. Blanking out your avatar will tell him “we’re on to you!”
Blanking out need not be just an American thing. We can be the trail blazers and lead to an an international cry of “ENOUGH!” Consider: the French yellow vests have been mischaracterized, the Hong Kong protesters have been silenced, and Trudeu’s Canadian government has throttled that country’s freedom of speech to an absurd degree. Blanking out can put them on notice.
Blanking out will also stir the very cohesion they fear. Imagine how much more confident other people will be in speaking their minds knowing there are others out there that feel as they do. Thousands? Millions? So many voices, now silent, crushed by a coterie of authoritarian Gestapo ready to pounce when they step out of line may be encouraged by a highly visible online protest.
But blanking out alone won’t do it. It can be passed off as a fad if mediated properly. Without real damage to the current power structures, it becomes another empty gesture. To overcome this, we need to attack advertising. Now, it seems to me the best way to attack advertising is to use the tools of cancel-culture against the advertisers. Specifically, we need to go ahead and flag every advert, without fail.
One of the easiest places to do this – and get noticed for doing it – is on Twitter. There they have “promoted tweets,” tweets companies pay for twitter to promote. It’s how twitter makes money. Whenever you see a promoted tweet either block them, or report the ad. It doesn’t matter what you report about it, just report it. “Was it sexual?” they may ask. Sure, why not. Any company sponsored tweet you see, report it (I like to claim “political ad”). They’ll have spent money, and will appeal it, but the truth is if enough people report the same tweet at some point the automatic software will stop it from circulating. Their reach will be reduced, hurting their bottom line. If anyone complains, state simply “you sponsor misinformation provided by twitter, so you are part of the problem.” Twitter has been caught lying on more than one occasion, how can you trust what their advertisers say?
These assaults on advertising need not be limited to twitter, by any means. Facebook is highly susceptible to this operation and, while I haven’t looked into it, I imagine Google, and its subsidiary YouTube, is also susceptible. “The advertisers” are ostensibly the reason google has been so censorious. The frailty of advertisers are why free debate is grinding to a halt on YouTube and Facebook, so it’s time to hit those platforms where it will hurt.
Another attack vector will be directly contacting the advertisers. Leftists are very vocal, swamping corporations with threats of boycott, even when they wouldn’t buy the product anyway. Why not organize a similar campaign, informing, say, Frito-lay you’ll boycott their chips unless they speak out against censorship? It couldn’t hurt. In fact, as I write this, I’m contemplating the attention an anti frito-lay rally complete with effigy burning of their product might gain for the cause of shaming the media.
Finally, there is what I call the Sabo-attack. Sabo is a well known street artist that “modifies” existing public advertising to get his message out. Billboards, bus-shelter signs and mailboxes are fair game, often with subversive messaging critical of left-wing politics. These are risky, and may carry legal peril, so I’ll leave it to you to determine if it’s a viable avenue of protest.
In all, advertising is their weak point, so we must attack their revenue stream to make a dent.
Please, join me in #BlankOutCensorship. Time is of the essence here. The WuFlu pandemic, and everything that followed, was “wargamed” at event 201 [https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/about], and planned out ahead of time. Lockdowns, censorship, musings on how the population could be controlled, all was studied. Participating in this event was China, who, no doubt, used the information gleaned to modulate their response and manipulate world reaction. Early video of China’s extreme reaction easily convinced many the over-reaction in the west was warranted. Perhaps it was planned that way. No matter. Leaders of the west gaily followed China’s example of oppression. A similar war game modeling "cyber pandemic", also run by the world economic forum (a confab of elitists,) called “Cyber Polygon” was run in 2020, and another “exercise” is planned for 2021 [https://www.weforum.org/projects/cyber-polygon]. Lest you think this is nothing to worry about, the World Economic Forum also aired, then deleted a video about “the great reset,” a plan to plunge the world into communism.
They have plans for us, and only united can we thwart them.