We need to begin to reclaim control over the institutions which have such oversized roles in our lives. As you read this people work tirelessly to see to it that you are dumb and docile. Let's stop them.
========
"The HB2111 legislation was signed into law Tuesday by Arizona Republican Gov. Doug Ducey, ensuring rights of gun owners are protected from potential overreaching gun laws sought by President Joe Biden's administration.
The law seeks to prohibit police and sheriffs from enforcing new federal gun laws, which critics say will undermine the rule of law and discourage law enforcement officers from enforcing federal gun laws to protect the public. Critics also say it is an unconstitutional measure that will cost taxpayers to defend in court.
...
"The state of Arizona and its political subdivisions are prohibited from utilizing any financial resources or state personnel to administer, cooperate with, or enforce any law, act, order, rule, treaty or regulation of the federal government that is inconsistent with any law of this state regarding the regulation of firearms," the text of the law reads."
========
"Thus far the state appears more competent than the team brought in against Zimmerman. Chauvin also appears to have very competent defense counsel. When a defendant has a good lawyer, this is half the game. While the jury is not perfect from a defense standpoint, it is not terrible either. That said, every single member of the jury pool expressed fear that a defense verdict would lead to retaliation.
As for Chauvin, I am inclined to think he is not guilty of the murder charges, not least because a murder case requires the murderer actually to cause the death of the victim. A merely incidental form of violence followed by a death does not cut it. Floyd did not die of trauma, asphyxiation, or anything else that happened during the arrest. He ingested large quantities of drugs and had an overdose; the stateâs autopsy says so. The video evidence also shows this, once you are aware of what to look for.
...
Observers following the trial closely have described most of the prosecution witnesses and evidence as middling at best. Some of the eyewitnesses who cajoled the police were less than impressive on the stand, several being admonished by the judge for giving evasive answers. One older black gentleman urged Floyd to stop resisting arrest, which provides some context for the police behavior. And, in the biggest surprise, while we were told George was crying for his mama as he lay dying on the street, it turns out his drug addict girlfriend was saved in his phone as âMama.â She also revealed Floyd had dealt drugs, had a similar overdose only months earlier, and recently relapsed.
The media has mostly downplayed these details.
...
One serious problem with the media is that it is so used to packaging news into ideological narratives that the general public has no idea really whatâs happening. Itâs not just a question of slant or editorializing; the facts are concealed, revealed, or even made up as necessary to support a message.
This is true in this case and in many others. While the availability of raw data and some exposure to original sources alleviates this, most people do not have the time, energy, or inclination to dig into every fishy story. And certain people are particularly credulous, especially when believing the narrative accrues social approval.
For the Chauvin trial, mainstream media reports have uniformly emphasized the prosecution scoring points. Floydâs drug use and violent activities have been given short shrift. Prosecution misstepsâthe âmamaâ incident, the defiant female firefighter at the scene, the MMA expert who apparently did not know how a âblood chokeâ works in jujitsuâhave not helped the prosecutionâs case.
We have seen this gap between reporting and reality before. The officers on trial following the 1991 Rodney King incident...
...
In 1992, after their acquittal, much of Los Angeles was aghast. No one thought the officers could possibly be acquitted. Opportunists and an angry populace pounced; Los Angeles soon became engulfed in deadly riots. Part of the communityâs shock and anger arose from relentless and irresponsible media propaganda. The media didnât show parts of the video where King violently resisted arrest, and their coverage of the trial mostly ignored the evidence that the police officersâ conductâwhile violentâwas defensible under the procedures and protocols in place at the time. They managed expectations in reverse.
...
There is almost no reason to trust the media today. Their turn toward increasingly crude propaganda is a disservice to the country and undermines their self-image as an important check on power. Intelligent people learn this early and generally seek out multiple sources and primary data on subjects of interest.
The media also bear responsibility for the fruits of their dishonesty, such as violent riots by impressionable, impulsive people. Rather than revealing a guilty defendant, their concealment of evidence in the Chauvin case reveals their own guilt and unprofessionalism. Their willingness to mislead and manipulate shows they know narratives matter and have consequences for peopleâs beliefs and actions."
========
"I realize nobody wants to hear that most of their "wealth" is nothing more than wispy Cloud Castles in the Sky that will dissipate in the faintest zephyr, but there it is: that which was conjured out of thin air will return to thin air.
I've assembled a few charts that reflect the illusion of financial wealth that has a death grip on the public psyche. Something for nothing is a powerful attractor, but it doesn't offer a narrative that the delusionally self-important demand: I earned this by working hard and being smart. Oh, right, yeah, sure. It had nothing to do with currency being created out of thin air and made available to insiders, financiers, banks, etc., or being able to leverage this new money into ever-larger bets, all guaranteed to be winning trades by the Federal Reserve. Nope, you're all stone-cold geniuses.
...
If we compare financial-bubble assets to the nation's Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a (flawed) measure of real-world activity, we find Cloud Castles in the Sky are worth over six times the nation's real-world economy. This reflects what happens to the valuations of Cloud Castles in the Sky when "money" is created out of thin air and then leveraged into fantastic, monstrous illusions of "wealth."
...
Take a look at the chart of M2 money stock, and please explain how this is just plain old normal healthy "capitalism" at work. After you've explained chasing your own tail, then explain who's getting all the Fed's free money for financiers. It isn't those working for a living, as evidenced by the chart of money velocity, which has plummeted into the Dead Money black hole from which there is no escape.
So by all means, lavish yourself with praise for constructing a Cloud Castle in the Sky of "wealth" with your hard work and genius, and keep chasing your own tail because the Fed has promised us it will always be the greater fool. What a pretty cloud, what a pretty fantasy."
========
"A horrifying new study has found that one in three survivors of Covid-19 have been diagnosed with a neurological or psychiatric condition in the six months since beating the disease.
The worrying research adds to a growing body of evidence which indicates that the specter of the coronavirus pandemic will likely loom large over humanityâs mental health for many years to come.
...
Some 17% of patients were diagnosed with anxiety, while 14% were diagnosed with mood disorders. For 13% of the patients, it was the first mental health condition with which they had ever been diagnosed.
Meanwhile, the neurological disorders included brain hemorrhages (in 0.6% of patients), stroke (2.1%), and dementia (0.7%), though these conditions were diagnosed at a lower rate than the psychiatric diagnoses.
...
Covid survivors had a 44% higher risk of neurological and mental health diagnoses than recovered flu patients, and 16% higher than recovered respiratory tract infection patients."
RT offers up a nice bit of propaganda for analysis. Look at what they've done with the statistics. First off, those "psychiatric conditions" are automatically deemed to be the result of covid. The term also encompasses a broad range of conditions and people tend to gravitate towards the most extreme forms of things when envisioning something they've heard mention of. "Psychiatric conditions" will imply to many readers far worse conditions than anxiety and mood disorders.
Secondly, look at how low those rates of neurological conditions are compared to psychiatric ones. Also keep in mind that covid tends to target the old (like many diseases) so you'll be more likely to see these things anyway in that group.
Now, I've got to hand it to these propaganda pushers because they attempted to address something similar with the final quoted paragraph. But, by combining the two categories they've utterly obliterated any ability for the reader to get an honest gauge of things leaving a critical reader to assume it was done with intent to mislead.
Finally, keep in mind that the flu doesn't come accompanied with non-stop fearporn. Or at least it hasn't in the past, who knows going forward.
It's a near-guarantee that this study will be used as a weapon against us deniers. But it shouldn't be an effective one.
========
"End-to-end encryption is once again under attack by authorities, this time in the UK and, once again, the idea is to undermine this fundamental feature of internet security by forcing tech companies to install backdoors in their apps and services.
UKâs Home Office wants to force Facebook to undermine the security of its products â Messenger, WhatsApp, and Instagram chat â in order to allow both police and spy agencies access to conversations they wish to see.
As security experts have been warning for years, once such a vulnerability is present, it can be used by anyone, including criminals and other bad actors â but British law enforcement and politicians pushing the idea still seem to think that they will be the only ones exploiting it.
...
As is so often the case when authorities promote the demise of end-to-end encryption, the way they justify it is by citing the need to protect children from online predators, or prevent terrorists and other criminals from communicating.
The way the UK plans to force Facebook to comply and build in backdoors is thought to be by using legal orders called âtechnical capability notices.â
These secret notices were ushered as part of the Investigatory Powers Act passed in 2016, in response to Edward Snowdenâs revelations about mass surveillance carried out by the US and the UK.
...
Yet, while politicians are considering an attempt to ban end-to-end encryption, itâs also politicians that are making the most of it to prevent investigations into what theyâre been up to.
UK government officials could be banned from using the self-destruct message feature on encrypted messengers such as WhatsApp and Signal, if a recent legal challenge is successful. A public interest group is arguing that encrypted messengers and the self-destruct messages feature could result in lack of accountability.
...
The legal challenge has been brought by a non-profit political group called Citizens through the law group Foxglove. The Citizens warned that encrypted messengersâ features carry the risk that our current time might be a âblack holeâ in history.
âWe are in an unprecedented national emergency and we are going to have no records of how decisions were made or even who made them,â a spokesperson for the Citizens added.
âGovernment business is being conducted under a cloak of secrecy enabled by the tech platforms. The only way we can have any hope of holding power to account or even simply maintaining the historic record is through transparency.â
The groupâs letter to the government demands a disclosure on the current measures in place to ensure important official communications are recorded and archived as the law requires. If the group does not receive a satisfactory answer within two weeks, it will proceed to a judicial review."
========
"AstraZenecaâs Covid-19 vaccine, Vaxzevria, should include a warning about the risk of blood clots as one of the jabâs very rare side effects, the EUâs drug regulator, the European Medicines Agency (EMA), has said.
The latest review by the EMAâs safety committee on the Anglo-Swedish vaccine has found that its benefits continue to outweigh the associated risks.
However, the agency said in a statement on Wednesday that both healthcare professionals and anyone receiving the vaccine should be reminded that âunusual blood clots with low blood plateletsâ remain a âvery rare side effect.â
The EMA said most reported cases of blood clots have been in women under 60 years of age within two weeks of being vaccinated with the Oxford/AstraZeneca jab.
...
The results of a previous EMA review, published on March 18, found that the vaccine was not associated with an increase in the overall risk of blood clots.
A number of countries subsequently resumed their rollouts, but imposed age limits on who could take the vaccine, due to the apparently younger profile of people who reported suffering blood clots after being administered the jab.
...
On Tuesday, Oxford University â which was involved in developing the inoculation with AstraZeneca â paused its trial of the vaccine in children while the UK regulator investigated a possible link between the jab and blood clots among some adult recipients."
========
"The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that mandatory vaccinations are legal in a significant judgment that could have a big impact on the rollout of the COVID-19 jab.
The ruling was in response to a complaint from a group of Czech families who had been fined and had their children denied nursery care over their refusal to let their kids take mandatory vaccinations against against nine diseases including diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, hepatitis B and measles.
The parents argued that the law was in violation of of Article 8 on the right to respect for private life, but the court disagreed and said that the compulsory jabs were in the âbest interestsâ of children to ensure âevery child is protected against serious diseases, through vaccination or by virtue of herd immunity.â
Mandatory vaccinations âcould be regarded as being ânecessary in a democratic societyâ,â the court judgment read."
========
"Rep. Barry Fleming, R-Harlem, who sponsored SB 202, currently has a separate omnibus election bill awaiting consideration on the Senate floor. His 45-page HB 531 aims to amend Chapter 2 of Title 21 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated ârelating to elections and primaries generally, to provide that no election superintendents or boards of registrars shall accept private funding; to provide for related matters; to repeal conflicting laws; and for other purposes.â
...
The amended bill would, among other security enhancements:
...
HB 531 passed the House on Mar. 1 and was read for a second time by the Senate Ethics committee on Mar. 25, where it remains for further debate."
========
"At least five countriesâ Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile and the USâ have approved a variety of maize genetically modified (GM) with a genome editing technique called CRISPR, without subjecting the crop to the risk assessments and regulations for GM crops. Other countries could soon follow.
The GM maize is produced by US-based Corteva, the worldâs second largest seed company and fourth largest pesticides company. Corteva describes the variety as a âwaxy cornâ which, like conventional waxy corn varieties, produces a starch high in amylopectin and low in amylose. In this case, Corteva used genetic engineering to knock out the genes responsible for producing amylose from its non-waxy hybrid maize varieties.
...
Although Corteva uses transgenes and particle bombardment to develop its GM waxy maize, it claims that the crop should not be regulated as a GMO since the transgenic material is, according to the company, no longer present in the seeds that are sold. So far the relevant authorities in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile and the US have cleared the crop for commercial release on this basis, without subjecting it to safety assessments required of other GM crops. On the other hand, as noted by CBAN, âCorteva appears not to have applied for approval in the European Union where a 2018 ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union requires genome edited crops to be subjected to the same stringent regulations as all genetically modified (GM) organisms.â
Corteva, which was created through the merger of Dow and DuPontâs agricultural divisions, has openly stated that it is using GM waxy corn to clear the way for the introduction of more GM crops produced with genome editing techniques (also known as âgene editingâ)....
...
âThe reason we are working on waxy corn is to have this conversation, because [we needed] to come forward with something that had a long history of safe use as a trait, [that] has important industrial uses both in food [âŚ], and in [other] industrial application, as well as ethanol,â Robert Meeley, Senior Research Scientist at Corteva, told delegates of the OECD Conference on Genome Editing in 2018. âWe needed to make something quick and have this conversation now, in order to get it out on the market.â
...
Farmers in China developed waxy maize hundreds of years ago and today there are thousands of farmer seed varieties of waxy maize grown across Asia. But seed companies like Corteva are not interested in these open-pollinated farmer varieties. Their only interest is in selling hybrid maize seeds that cannot be saved by farmers. The problem for seed companies, however, is that waxy maize is not easy to breed as a hybrid. The process is complicated, time consuming and tends to result in a âyield dragâ when compared with their non-waxy counterparts.
Cortevaâs only innovation with its GM waxy maize is that it used genome editing to avoid a âyield dragâ and to shave a year off of the time it would have taken to achieve the same results through conventional hybrid breeding. This is hardly a big game changer for farmers. But itâs huge for seed companies, particularly those that control the patent rights over the technology....
...
...Over the past five years it has been partnering with the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) in Mexico to develop hybrid maize varieties for Africa through genome editing. The programme is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and there is a revolving door tightly integrating all three institutions.1 Corteva and CIMMYT claim genome editing can cut the time required to breed hybrids in half and they plan to release a first batch of GM hybrids resistant to maize lethal necrosis in Kenya by 2025. Kenya is currently drafting legislation to regulate genome edited crops âusing procedures in Argentina as a modelâ.
For a technology thatâs being sold by the seed giants as non-GMO, itâs hard to see any difference from their old GMO playbook."
We don't need these things. We are needlessly tampering with the natural world to enrich corporations & the elite.
========
"Lady Gaga, Robert De Niro, and other high-profile celebrities have teamed up for a vague commercial promoting the so-called âWELL Health-Safety Seal,â an expensive endorsement for business owners that many are panning as useless.
...
The ad â directed by none other than Spike Lee â only vaguely explains what this seal actually is. Paul Scialla, the founder of IWBIâs (International WELL Building Institute) parent company Delos, shows up to promise that the safety endorsement is based on âyears of input and research.â
Every business from stadiums to banks is mentioned as a possible place where the seal can be found, with things like âcleaning and sanitizing procedures,â âemergency preparedness programsâ and âhealth servicesâ being considered."
========
Video: Diners Chant âGet Outâ as Health Officials Try to Shut Down Restaurant
"The clip shows a pair of health officials talking to Corduroy Restaurant owner Rebecca Matthews as she tells the bureaucrats they are trespassing before asking them to leave.
At first, the health officials refuse to leave but their behavior soon changes when the rest of the diners begin to chant âget out!â
As the pair begin to exit, customers in the background can be seen hugging each other and cheering."
========
"Governor Brad Little has issued an executive order banning so-called âvaccine passportsâ in his state. Amid a national row over the passports, Idaho is the third state to ban them.
âVaccine passports restrict the free flow of commerce during a time when life and economy are returning to normal,â Little said on Wednesday before signing the order, which bans all government entities in Idaho from requiring proof of vaccination to receive services or enter facilities.
...
Neither Littleâs nor Abbottâs orders, however, would penalize private companies â like airlines or restaurants â from requiring proof of vaccination. DeSantisâ order goes further, and bans local businesses from requiring such passes, ordering state authorities to cease doing business with any company that asks for them."
========
"Writer Thomas Frank published a piece in The Guardian last week called, âLiberals want to blame rightwing 'misinformation' for our problems. Get real.â Its basic argument was that rather than look inward for reasons the Democratic Party message isnât succeeding, and why political extremism is on the rise, Democrats have instead opted for a strategy of âshushing the world.â
Frank addressed the âclampdown maniaâ of the Internet era, expressing puzzlement over a change in how Democrats look at the speech issue now, versus how traditional liberals almost unanimously viewed the issue in the not-so-distant-past.
âCriticism, analysis, mockery, and protest: these were our weapons,â he wrote. âCensorship and blacklisting were, with important exceptions, the weapons of the puritanical right.â
...
âThere was a time when liberalism was the dominant tradition in America,â he says. âDemocrats always controlled the House of Representatives. And they couldnât figure out what happened to them.â
In 2004, Whatâs the Matter With Kansas? offered an explanation that was soothing, on its face. The core thesis was that cultural issues replaced economics as the primary driver of decision-making in the heartland, and Republicans were winning by appeals to evangelical Christianity, racism, and other passions. This explanation was alluring to a lot of Democrats at the time, among other things because it absolved the party of blame for losing influence. After all, if people in Kansas were superstitious racists, whatâs a K Street Democratic consultant to do? You canât pander to Klansmen and idiots.
...
Few, however, remembered the end of the book, which warned of a negative trajectory within the Democratic Party. While Republicans âwere industriously fabricating their own class-based language of the rightâ and âmade their populist appeal to blue-collar voters,â Democrats were âgiving those same votersâtheir traditional baseâthe big brush-off.â
...
The type of liberalism Frank knew growing up, and for which he was such a prominent symbol in the Bush years (when âlibrulsâ were commodities hated as fervently as terrorists in some circles), would never have entertained censorship as a serious solution to anything.
What happened? Why has American liberalism gone through such a sea change on this issue? I asked Tom about this, and about the Guardian piece that sparked the backlash..."
========
"While his COVID-19 policies have dominated media coverage regarding his disappearance and suspicious death, Tanzaniaâs John Magufuli was hated by the Western elites for much more than his rebuke of lockdowns and mask mandates. In particular, his efforts towards nationalizing the countryâs mineral wealth threatened to deprive the West of control over resources deemed essential to the new green economy.
...
Indeed, more threatening than his recent COVID controversies was the threat Magufuli posed to foreign control over the worldâs largest, ready-to-develop nickel deposit, a metal essential to electric car batteries and thus the current effort to usher in an electric, autonomous vehicle revolution. For instance, just a month before he disappeared, Magufuli had signed an agreement to begin developing that nickel deposit, a deposit that had been previously co-owned by Barrick Gold and Glencore, the commodity giant deeply tied to Israelâs Mossad, until Magufuli revoked their licenses for the project in 2018.
Running afoul of the most powerful corporate and banking cartels followed then by the mysterious onset of sudden regime change would normally garner considerable coverage from anti-imperialist independent media outlets, which recently covered similar events in Bolivia that led to the removal of Evo Morales from power. However, the very outlets that have extensively covered Western-backed regime change efforts for years have been entirely silent on the very convenient death of Magufuli. Presumably, their silence is related to Magufuliâs flouting of COVID-19 narrative orthodoxy, as these same outlets have largely promoted the official narrative of the pandemic.
...
In contrast to Magufuli, who routinely stood up to predatory corporations and imperialist designs on his country, Samia Suhulhu and Tanzanian opposition politician Tundu Lissu are poised to offer up their countryâs resources, and their population, on the altar of the Western elite-driven 4th industrial revolution.
...
...Magufuliâs term was characterized by making decisions that benefited the majority of Tanzanians, largely at the expense of foreign corporations but also by overhauling a government known for its entrenched corruption and absenteeism prior to Magufuliâs rise. His administration cut the salaries of the executives at state-owned companies, as well as his own salary, from $15,000 to $4,000 USD. Some State parades and celebrations were reduced or cancelled to cover the expenses of public hospitals.
Healthcare had long been one of Magufuliâs priorities, and the life expectancy of the country significantly increased every year he was in office. In addition, in the previous 50 years of Tanzanian independence, only 77 district hospitals were constructed, whereas during the past 4 years alone, 101 such hospitals were constructed and equipped with local funds. By July 2020, the country had grown from a so-called lower income country to a middle income country, per the World Bank.
A recent report by the hawkish, US establishment think tank, the Center for Strategic International Studies (CSIS), was highly critical of Magufuli, but noted the following about his political philosophy:
âMagufuli, who subscribes to his own homegrown âTanzania firstâ philosophy, believes that Tanzania has been cheated out of profit and wealth by exploitative mabeberu (âimperialistsâ) since independence. To secure populist support, Magufuli has fashioned his agenda as a continuation of the socialist vision of Tanzaniaâs first president, Mwalimu Julius Nyerere, who advocated self-reliance, an intolerance to corruption, and a strong nationalist character.â
...
...in late 2018, Tanzaniaâs government ordered a stop to all ongoing field trials on genetically modified (GM) crops and the destruction of all plants grown as part of those trials. Those trials were being conducted by a partnership called the Water Efficient Maize for Africa (WEMA) project, which was a collaboration between Monsanto and the African Agricultural Technology Foundation, a non-profit funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, GM seed/agrochemical giant Syngenta, PepsiCo and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), long known to be a cut-out for the CIA. Then, in January of 2021, a month before Magufuliâs disappearance, Tanzaniaâs agriculture ministry not only announced a cancellation of all âresearch trials involving genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the countryâ for the second time, it also announced plans to institute new biosafety regulations aimed at protecting Tanzaniaâs food sovereignty by scrutinizing western GM seed imports.
...
In the years prior to Magufuliâs rise, Tanzania had offered relatively low tax rates and little regulatory oversight for mining companies. Yet, in 2017, Magufuli declared âeconomic warfareâ on foreign mining companies and his administration followed through on the declaration, passing two laws that provided the government with a much greater share of the revenue from the exploitation of Tanzaniaâs natural resources. This, of course, came at the expense of foreign mining conglomerates. The new legislation also gave the government the right to renegotiate and/or revoke existing mining licenses that had been awarded prior to Magufuliâs presidency.
...
2018 was also the year that Magufuliâs biggest rift with powerful mining corporations took place, one that potentially influenced his disappearance and subsequent death. The Kabanga nickel project, the largest, development-ready nickel deposit in the world, had been owned jointly by Canadaâs Barrick Gold and commodities giant Glencore. In May 2018, Magufuliâs administration revoked the Barrick-Glencore license for the project, along with several others that included other nickel, gold, silver, copper and rare earth mining projects.
...
Then, in January 2021, a month before Magufuli disappeared, the Kabanga Nickel project went forward without Glencore and Barrick Gold, with Tanzania successfully negotiating joint ownership of the mine with a company set up by Norwegian millionaire Peter Smedvig and two of his associates. Unlike the Barrick-Glencore project, in which Tanzaniaâs government had no financial stake, the new project gave Tanzania a 16% ownership stake in the mine, which is now required by law following Magufuliâs reform of the countryâs mining sector.
...
...it is worth noting that Glencore, which had its ownership of the Kabanga nickel deposit revoked by Magufuli, is closely tied to the World Economic Forum and is part of the Forumâs Global Battery Alliance as well as its Mining and Metals Blockchain Initiative, both of which focus on supply chains for minerals deemed essential to the 4th Industrial Revolution. Also of interest is the fact that Tundu Lissu, the Magufuli governmentâs most vocal critic and a main source for all mainstream media Tanzania reporting, was formerly employed by the World Resources Institute (WRI), a US-based non-profit and âstrategic partnerâ of the World Economic Forum. The WRI aims to build âclean energy marketsâ and âvalue supply chains,â supply chains which will inevitably depend on cheaply sourced raw materials like nickel, graphite, and cobalt.
The World Resource Institute has received no less than $7.1 million from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and, according to the WRI donor page, theyâve received no less than $750,000 from the Westâs most powerful corporate actors including Shell, Citibank, The Rockefeller Foundation, Google, Microsoft, The Open Society Foundation, USAID, and the World Bank. Lissu praised news of Magufuliâs sudden death as a âreliefâ and an âopportunity for a new beginningâ in Tanzania. Tellingly, he also spoke very positively of the countryâs future under Magufuliâs Vice President and current President Samia Suhulu, suggesting that she will take the country in a direction very different than that of her predecessor.
...
...the now ubiquitous mainstream narrative of Magufuli being âanti-science.â That narrative was first established as early as May 2020, when Magufuli exposed the inaccuracy of imported PCR testing kits after a goat, a piece of fruit, and motor oil all received âpositiveâ test results from the supplied kits. âThere is something happening ⌠we should not accept that every aid is meant to be good for this nation,â he proclaimed in a national address.
...
However, in the months that followed May 2020, the accuracy of PCR testing kits have been called into question, not only by mainstream media, but also âauthoritativeâ global health bodies like the World Health Organization, thereby validating Magufuliâs initial critique. In a story titled âYour Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldnât Beâ, the New York Times reported that the âstandard [PCR] tests are diagnosing huge numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts of the virus. . . and are not likely contagious.â
In November 2020, a landmark court case in Portugal ruled that the PCR test used to diagnose COVID-19 was not fit for that purpose, ruling that âa single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection.â...
...
...The position that PCR testing kits are unreliable is not new science, as a 2007 New York Times article titled âFaith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic that Wasnâtâ wrote that the sensitivity of PCR testing kits âmakes false positives likely, and when hundreds or thousands of people are tested, false positives can make it seem like there is an epidemic.â In addition, large batches of PCR test kits in the early phase of the COVID-19 crisis were contaminated with COVID-19 prior to their use, which was later found to have significantly skewed the number of cases reported in the early phases of the pandemic in the US and beyond.
...
...as far back as 1977, studies published in The Lancet established that the risks of the diphtheria tetanus pertussis (DTP) vaccine are greater than the risks associated with contracting wild pertussis. After mounting evidence linking the drug to braindamage, seizures, and even death, the U.S. phased it out in the 1990s and replaced it with a safer version called DTaP. A 2017 study funded by the Danish government concluded that more African children were dying at the hands of the deadly DTP vaccinethan by the diseases it prevented. Researchers examined data from Guinea Bissau and concluded that boys were dying at 3.9 times the rate of those who had not received the shot, while girls suffered almost 10 times (9.98) the death rate. GAVI, subsidized by USAID and the Gates Foundation, has dumped over $27 million worth of the dangerously outdated DTP vaccine onto the Tanzanian health system as of today.
...
...According to a Times article from February, South Africa halted use of the AstraZeneca-Oxford coronavirus vaccine after evidence emerged that the vaccine did not protect clinical trial volunteers from mild or moderate illness.â
...
In October 2020, Magufuli was reelected to a second, five year term, this time gaining a resounding 84.39% of vote. At the time, the US government-funded outlet Voice of America (VOA) quoted one Tanzanian, Edward Mbise, who told the outlet that â[they] all expected [Magufuli] to win due to what he has done ⌠he has accomplished so many things that you canât even finish listing all of them.â
However, Tundu Lissu, the leader of Magufuliâs main opposition party, alleged that the election had been fraudulent, but provided no evidence. According to the same VOA article, Lissu called for âcitizens [to] take action to ensure all election results are changed.â
...
...It is worth pointing out that the similarities between the election fraud accusations in Tanzania and those made in Bolivia just prior to the US-backed November 2019 coup are considerable.
...
While a swift leadership transition in Tanzania might seem like an unexpected surprise to western financial interests, groups in the US who specialize in foreign meddling and regime change operations had been at work in Tanzania ever since Magufuliâs initial election victory. The National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a US government think/do tank which aims to âsupport freedom around the world,â pumped $1.1 million into different Tanzanian opposition groups and causes over the last few years. One co-founder of NED, Allen Weinstein, once disclosed to the Washington Post that âA lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA.â Carl Gershman, NEDâs other co-founder, once told the New York Times that âIt would be terrible for democratic groups around the world to be seen as subsidized by the CIA . . .and thatâs why the endowment was created.â
NEDâs recent operations in Tanzania included projects to âorganize young people to promote reform, and introduce them to new media tools that can assist in their effortsâ, ârecruit and train young artists to convey stories about governanceâ, financially support an opposition-friendly âsatiricalâ news production that provides humorous commentary on current events to âencourage conversationsâ, as well as financially supporting the production of a âcomprehensive televised civic education campaignâ aimed at both COVID-related public awareness and âvoter education.â The grantee for the funds, the Tanzania Bora Initiative, whose slogan is âtransforming mindsets, influencing culturesâ boasts of âempowering over 50 young Tanzanian political candidates.â The Tanzania Bora Initiative was also heavily supported by USAID while Magufuli was in office.
...
Convenient for the powers that Magufuli had angered, his successor and VP, Samia Suluhu, hails from the United Nationsâ World Food Programme and has a profile listed on the website of the World Economic Forum, suggesting a closeness with the circles her predecessor had rebuked. It still remains unclear if she has already reversed any of Magufuliâs policies, either economic or COVID-related, but some shifts seem likely given that her appointment has been met with pure celebration by the same institutional actors that actively worked to undermine President Magufuli.
Another potential indicator is the dubious discovery of a new COVID variant in Tanzania that reportedly has more mutations than any other variant. That variantâs discovery was announced just over a week following the announcement of Magufuliâs death and seems tailor-made to provide a public justification of a reversal of Tanzaniaâs government approach to COVID. Notably, the Tanzania variant was discovered by Krisp, âa scientific institute that carries out genetic testing for 10 African nationsâ that is funded by the Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust and the governments of the US, the UK and South Africa.
...
...Zambia, which borders Tanzania and is set to hold elections this August, is currently angering some of the same actors that Magufuli had challenged in its governmentâs efforts to nationalize its copper mines and potentially other mining projects. In December, Zambian President Edgar Lungu announced that his government would acquire âa significant stake in some selected mine assetsâ in order to âcreate sufficient wealth for the nation.â Echoing Magufuli, Lungu had stated âWe shall no longer tolerate mining investors who seek to [profit] from our God-given natural resources, leaving us with empty hands.â
...
...a week after Magufuliâs death was announced, Lunguâs main competitor in the upcoming election publicly accused Lungu of trying to have him murdered while some English language, pro-Western media outlets have already claimed that Lungu plans to rigthe upcoming election in his favor and that the country âmay burnâ if the election has the âwrongâ outcome.
Such examples reveal that the situation that has recently unfolded in Tanzania is hardly unique in todayâs Africa. However, the domination of the media landscape with constant COVID coverage has made Western audiences largely unaware of the various regime change efforts that have taken place or are underway in the region. Unlike regime change efforts of the recent past, those targeting Africa, and also Bolivia, seem laser focused on mining assets deemed essential to establishing the supply chains needed to power the 4th Industrial Revolution.
With many of these countries having recently cozied up to China, it seems the regime change projects and proxy wars of the future are set to revolve, not around fossil fuels and pipelines, but over whether the East or the West will dominate the supplies of minerals needed to produce and maintain next-generation technology."
========
"New York state has been testing and deploying a Covid vaccine program for some months now, but reports suggest evidence is already mounting that the scheme is headed for failure.
The Excelsior Pass looks like itâs turning into a perfect storm of incompetence, design and implementation-wise, and one that, even though it handles sensitive medical data, is open to manipulation, the investigative blog The Dossier suggests.
...
It doesnât help that New York chose IBM and its âblockchainâ platform as the backbone of Excelsior Pass just as reports in February suggested that the companyâs blockchain effort was a complete financial failure, missing revenue targets by 90%, while the majority of its blockchain team is now gone.
And Excelsior Pass has poor security in place, allowing anyone to check a personâs eligibility and access their Covid-related health records through the app simply by entering their name, date of birth and ZIP code.
After this, more ârelatively easily obtained informationâ is required to verify identity, The Dossier writes. âEven if you get some questions wrong, it appears that you can go back in and answer an unlimited amount of times until you get the right combination,â said the report."
========
"Portugal and the Netherlands have become the latest countries to restrict their rollouts of the Covid-19 vaccine developed by AstraZeneca after a review by the EU's drug regulator found blood clots can be a very rare side effect.
The Dutch cabinet has been advised by the Health Council, a scientific advisory body, to pause its use of the jab in those under the age of 60 in light of the safety concerns, broadcaster NOS reported on Thursday.
The Netherlands' health minister, Hugo de Jonge, has also said that younger people should be given an alternative vaccine, due to their higher risk of blood clots.
...
Spain and Italy have already announced they will stop using the vaccine in people under the age of 60, while Belgium has temporarily limited it to the over-55s."
========
"Wisconsin has been an early battleground for challenges to the presumption that perceived health threat gives lawmakers new authority. On Wednesday, March 31, the State Supreme Court ruled 4-3 against Governor Tony Eversâ ability to issue any new health emergency orders without approval from the state legislature.
...
Justice Brian Hagedorn delivered the majority opinion, which addresses dissent: âSome may wish our analysis would focus on ensuring the Governor has sufficient power to fight COVID-19; others may be more concerned about expansive executive power. But outside of a constitutional violation, these policy concerns are not relevant to this courtâs task in construing the statute. Whether the policy choices reflected in the law give the governor too much or too little authority to respond to the present health crisis does not guide our analysis. Our inquiry is simply whether the law gives the governor the authority to successively declare states of emergency in this circumstance. The dissent, in contrast, spends considerable space discussing outcome-focused concerns. But our role is not to rule in favor of outcomes we like; it is to interpret and apply the law, whether we like it or not.â
...
As the weather warms in 2021, a new wave of citizen protest events has arisen alongside judicial challenges, notably the more or less centrally organized Worldwide Demonstrations that were held on March 20, to âmake it clear that the governmentâs attempts to divide us have been unsuccessful.â...
...
Floridian, Chris Nelson is organizing a âMillion Maskless March and Mask Burningâ for April 10, in Ft. Lauderdale with ReOpen South Florida, UnMasking America, and the Libertarian Party of Broward County. Nelson wrote, âThe mask burning is in full cooperation with local law enforcement and will be done in a safe and controlled manner⌠Jesus said we should not hide our light but show it to the whole world. Our goal is for people to see us and be inspired to join in!â"
========
"...researchers have known for half a century the mechanism by which people can be made to effectively lock themselves up inside their own mental prisonâŚand it didnât take long for the intelligence agencies to put that research to use.
Today, letâs explore the startling true story of how and how the public has been conditioned into a (false) sense of helplessness, and â more important by far â what you can do to break that conditioning.
...
...Martin Seligman, a psychologist at the University of Pennsylvania, conducted a series of experiments in the late 1960s that essentially replicated this elephant and the rope phenomenon.
Entitled âLearned Helplessness,â his 1972 paper outlining this research showed how Seligman and his team had subjected two sets of dogs to painful electric shocks.
The first group of dogs were placed in a âshuttle boxâ where they could escape the electric shocks by jumping over a small barrier. These dogs soon learned that crossing the barrier protected them from the shocks and (as you would expect) crossed the barrier more and more quickly each time the experiment was performed until they could escape the shocks altogether.
The second group of dogs were placed in what Seligman described as a âPavlovian hammockâ from which they could not escape the shocks however much they struggled. This set of dogs reacted completely differently from the control group when placed in the shuttle box. Fully two-thirds of this group did not even try to escape the shocks and thus never discovered that they could avoid them altogether by crossing the barrier. They simply lay down, whining, until the shocks ceased.
The lesson of this experiment is seemingly straightforward: âBy our hypothesis, the dog does not try to escape because he expects that no instrumental response will produce shock termination.â In other words, if you want to induce complete helplessness in a dog, condition them to believe that nothing they do will make any difference.
...
So how long do you think it took for the CIA to start weaponizing Seligmanâs research for use against its enemies? If your answer was âthree decades,â then you win a prize!
Yes, by the time the war (of) terror came along, the Criminals In Action were using Seligmanâs experiments as a how-to guide in their illegal torture program.
...
In a sick way, the CIAâs experiments in inducing learned helplessness proved that Seligman had discovered valid insights into a real psychological phenomenon. It certainly is possible to create the conditions to break someoneâs will and cause them to confess to whatever their torturers want. But this is emphatically not the point of the learned helplessness research and it is important to note that Seligman, for his part, was never aware that his research was being used by the CIA until after the the Senateâs report on the torture program was released to the public and that he completely denounced the perversion of his research when it was exposed.
...
...As I have pointed out time and time again, not only is the entire concept of âelectingâ ârepresentativesâ to impose their will on the entire population of an arbitrary geographical location fundamentally immoral, it is also a sure way to induce learned helplessness in the population.
As you know by now, the 2D political chess game that is used to distract the public does absolutely nothing to change the real political agenda that is set by the 3D chess masters. And just as every child eventually discovers that their toy driving wheel doesnât actually control the car, so, too, do even the most devoted statists eventually begin to realize that their ballot in the voting box every four years does nothing to prevent the globalist agenda from playing out like an unstoppable nightmare.
...
But what if we were to examine the results of this experiment from the other side? What if, instead of the would-be controllers of humanity, we examine these findings for what they can tell us about how to empower the public and dispel the learned helplessness that keeps them from looking for real solutions?
This is the question that Seligman turned to after the publication of his experimental findings. You see, he was not experimenting on dogs because he was a sadist. Nor was he simply interested in studying learned helplessness, either in dogs or humans.
After documenting the phenomenon, his focus quickly shifted to what could be done with this knowledge. As Maria Konnikova documents in her 2015 New Yorker article on the research:
But Seligman didnât stop his research there. He had told his supervisor that he didnât believe in causing suffering unless it had some inherent value that would lead to bettering lives, both canine and human. So he and Maier [his colleague in the original experiments] set out to figure out a way to reverse the effect of learned helplessness in the dogs. What they found was that one simple tweak could stop the passivity from developing.
When the researchers first put all the dogs in the shuttle box, where the shock was controllable by a jump, and, only then, into the inescapable harness, the effect of the harness was broken: now, even though the dogs were being bombarded by shocks, they didnât give up. They kept trying to control the situation, pressing the panels despite the lack of feedback. And when they were again put into the box, they didnât cower. Instead, they immediately reclaimed their ability to avoid shocks.
...
This is part of the core ethos of my #SolutionsWatch series. There are, certainly, those things that are completely beyond our control. But, because they are beyond control, there is absolutely no point in focusing on them.
Our priority has to be those things that are within our control. Where and how we live; what we spend our time, money and energy doing; who we spend our time with; how we provide the necessities for our family; the type of community that we live in: all of these things are, to some extent, things that we can have a direct influence on, and by exerting that influence (however slight), we train ourselves that our situation is not hopeless."
========
"When the Pentagon began gearing up for a future war with China in 2018, Defense Department officials quickly realized that they needed access to Vietnamese territory for troops armed with missiles to hit Chinese ships in a US-China conflict. So they initiated an aggressive campaign to lobby the Vietnamese government, and even Communist Party officials, in the hope that they would eventually support an agreement to provide them the permission.
But a Grayzone investigation of the Pentagonâs lobbying push in Vietnam shows what a delusional exercise it was from its inception. In a fit of self-deception that highlighted the desperation behind the bid, the US military ignored abundant evidence that Vietnam had no intention of giving up its longstanding, firmly grounded policy of equidistance between the United States and China.
...
Between 2010 and 2017, China developed intermediate-range missiles capable of hitting American bases in Japan and South Korea. To counter that threat, the Pentagon and military services began working on a new strategy in which US Marines, accompanied by an array of missiles, would spread out over a network of small, rudimentary bases and move continuously from one base to another.
Vietnam was the logical choice for such sites. Australia and the Philippines publicly ruled out hosting US missiles capable of hitting China, and South Korea was considered unlikely to agree. Indonesia and Singapore were too economically dependent on China to be interested.
...
In their pursuit of Vietnamâs active involvement in its new war strategy, however, the Defense Department and military brass were ignoring the fundamental fact that the Communist Party of Vietnam and military leadership were not going to budge from the strategic policy to which it had been publicly committed for two full decades.
The policy was summed up in three fundamental principles: no military alliances, no aligning with one country against another, and no foreign military bases on Vietnamese soil....
...
When Vietnamâs long-awaited new National Defense White Paper was published in late November 2019, [Derek] Grossman [RANDâs specialist on Vietnamese defense policy] discovered new reasons for pressing ahead with the Pentagonâs bid for Vietnamâs cooperation with the new US military against China. He suggested that the Vietnamese had planted âsubtle messages of opportunity for Washingtonâ in the document, including its readiness to participate in âsecurity and defense mechanisms in the Indo-Pacific region.â
And he pointed to a new supplement to what had now become Vietnamâs âfour noes.â â[D]epending on the circumstances and specific conditions,â it said, âVietnam will consider developing necessary, appropriate defense and military relations with other countries.â In practice, that merely meant that if Vietnam were seriously threatened by a Chinese attack, it could abandon its commitment to those four ânoesâ.
...
Nguyen The Phuong, a research associate at the Centre for International Studies, National University-Ho Chi Minh City, confirmed in an interview with The Grayzone that the basic Vietnamese policy of maintaining equidistance between China and the United States is not questioned by anyone within the Vietnamese government. He observed that both civilian and military officials believe the US Navy had no effective strategy for curbing Chinese operations in the maritime zone that Vietnam claims.
The only difference of opinion which had arisen within that consensus, he said, was that many Vietnamese diplomats with whom he has talked believe that the US Coast Guard, which is not under the control of Defense Department â but which the US nevertheless considers a military service â would be more effective tool in countering Chinaâs tactics in the contested maritime zone in the South China Sea than the US Navy has been. They also believed that giving the Coast Guard access to Vietnamâs deep-water port at Cam Ranh Bay would not be provocative to China. The military leadership, however, has rejected that idea, according to Nguyen.
...
The story of the Pentagonâs pursuit of Vietnam as a potential military partner against China reveals an extraordinary degree of self-deception surrounding the entire endeavor. And it adds further detail to the already well-established picture of a muddled and desperate bureaucracy seizing on any vehicle possible to enable it to claim that US power in the Pacific can still prevail in a war with China."
========
"...my quest today â my Appeal to you, as Human Rights Representative â is to please pick up the issue of Covid-based Human Rights abuses on the world population, but particularly on children.
What the absurd covid measures do to the world is a crime, but what they are doing to children is beyond a crime; it is totally immoral, destructive for our powerless children, and for the future of these children, as well as for society as a whole, as children are our societiesâ future. And worse of all, these measures have nothing to do with health protection â but absolutely nothing. They are sheer tyranny to control.
Children behind masks, social distancing, locked-down, remote schooling â deprived from meeting, talking and playing with their peers, friends, instead scaring them into losing their personalities, their self-assurance and self-esteem â results not only in a physical health problem, but also a psychological health issue which over time has untold, uncountable collateral damage, including total submissiveness for todayâs children.
Our children are vulnerable â they are our future.
They need their Human Rights defended."
========
"Texas Governor Greg Abbott has announced a ban on so-called vaccine passports, becoming the second US governor to officially do so, just a few days after Floridaâs Ron DeSantis. The issue has largely broken along political lines.
Abbott made an announcement on Tuesday declaring that no Texas government agencies or political entities would be permitted to require âvaccine passportsâ in the state.
...
Abbottâs Florida counterpart, Ron DeSantis, unveiled a similar ban on Friday, barring all state agencies and local businesses from issuing âvaccine passportsâ and banning state government agencies from doing business with private companies that require such passports. He has permitted businesses and restaurants to operate at full capacity since September, bringing in throngs of visitors as other coastal states remained at least partially shuttered, and has for weeks denounced vaccine passports as a âcompletely unacceptableâ form of government intrusion.
...
The Florida governor and others against vaccine passports have expressed concern that the adoption of such mandates would âcreate two classes of citizens based on vaccinations,â and that putting private companies in charge of guarding vaccine data would be akin to putting the fox in charge of guarding the henhouse, deeming it preposterous that anyone must âshow proof of vaccine to just simply be able to participate in normal society.â"
========
"A key category of election ballots cast in 2020 that has been largely overlooked in analyzing what transpired consists of Write-In and Minor Party (WIMP) votes. An important study by retired DoD analyst Ray Blehar concludes that vote tabulation anomalies that he uncovered in Pennsylvania âare not a matter of chance and are almost certainly the result of systematic vote shiftingâ (stealing) of WIMP votes cast through ballot adjudication. He further concludes that vote-shifting of WIMP ballots also took place in Arizona, Wisconsin, and Georgia because those states each had a near-zero number of Write-In absentee ballots cast. The Minor Party votes for president were far fewer than for other same party candidates in statewide races.
...
A systematic and coordinated effort by Democrat operatives and sympathizers both inside and outside state governments to rig state election laws in 2020 was openly admitted and confirmed in a sympathetic article in TIME on February 4. The evidence of the end result of that rigging was collected by various independent analysts and investigators, in the form of polling place abuses, false voter registrations (includes fake ballots), hundreds of thousands more voters in some states than were registered to vote, and US Postal Service corruption. Through analysis of election data in several states, specific irregularities that indicate the high likelihood that fraud occurred have been identified, including:
...
The irregularities and evidence listed above could explain how this happened, but was that the only possible explanation? Were there other ways that put Biden over the top beside the obvious (producing more Biden votes in heavily Democrat city precincts)? What if votes were shaved or switched from Trump to Biden in Republican counties and precincts? What if write-in and minor party ballots were manipulated in favor of Biden? Given the conspiracy exposed in the TIME article, one would think that these practices would have been employed to camouflage what actually happened during the presidential election.
...
...a key definition is in order. âAdjudicated ballotsâ refer to ballots that were not specifically cast for Trump, Biden, or Jorgenson (the Libertarian candidate on the ballot in Pennsylvania) as determined by the automated ballot marking system. There are two routes that ballots take to be processed â ballots counted normally by machine or hand and those that are adjudicated. Adjudicated ballots are typically write-in ballots, mismarked ballots (double votes), misaligned ballots, and other categories. However, software/malware can also be programmed to make a voting machine recognize a âstraight partyâ ballot as misaligned and send it to adjudication. Adjudication is really where the vote shift happens.
...
Computerized election system vote-switching is a 14th Amendment issue involving the denial of equal protection under the law. This issue can still be pursued through the courts if a forensic audit and recount can prove that Write-In and Minority Party (WIMP) voters were disenfranchised and that the election results in some states were illegal under the U.S. Constitution. This also happens to be the smartest way to change the results of the election because the plaintiffs would be asking for votes to be properly counted for the right candidates â not asking for large quantities of votes to be disqualified.
Full hand recounts and forensic audits of the election systems will verify that vote shifting occurred. This is necessary and no expense should be spared to get to the bottom of the 2020 election irregularities and preserve the Republic."
Keep in mind that as with much statistical data its possible to look at the same data and draw different conclusions.